New Mexico Political Journal
mobile icon
New Mexico Political Journal

.

Show Subnavigation
  • Home
  • About NMPJ
    • About
    • Editor
  • Feedback
  • Advertise on NMPJ

FacebookTwitter

If you read New Mexico Political Journal from a Facebook link, and appreciate the coverage of events, please “like” NMPJ on Facebook.

The Whole Woman Thing: Differing World Views. Myth and Reality. Only Women.

02/03/2032

Andrew Mayzak feeling inspired.

Yesterday at 3:49pm · Redmond, WA ·
 

Can we talk about this for a minute?

This is a Yale-educated law professor, First Lady, Senator, and Secretary of State who:

-Endured 25 years of smear campaigns
-Lost the Electoral College by 80,000 votes
-Won the popular vote by 3 million votes
-Attended her opponent's inauguration
-Received no handshake from Trump
-Was booed by the crowd when she appeared

And goddammit... LOOK at her. Polished and confident, wearing white for the Suffragettes, her husband taking *her* arm instead of the other way around.

Symbolism matters.

Perseverance matters.

She matters.

This is the godmother of New America, a rational, pragmatic, imperfect human being who was born 50 years too early for her gender to be a non-issue in an election.

While she missed the presidency, she arrived just in time to show us all, in unflinching terms, the deep undercurrent of sexist double standards in our society.

And in doing so, she taught generations of girls and women that yes, you DO matter and yes, you CAN do anything.

This is Hillary Clinton.

 

FULL COMPLIANCE CONSULTING, LLC

Helping candidates, elected officials, committees, PACs and lobbyists, navigate Campaign Finance Reporting, Campaign Practices, the Governmental Conduct Act and the many complexities of the Election Code in New Mexico.

If you are having problems with ballot access, or receiving threats of disqualification, contact us!

Statewide Offices • Legislative Races • County Offices • Judicial & Regional Offices

Email: fccllc@terrcomm.net   Full Compliance Consulting, LLC    P.O. Box 2163 ♦ Santa Fe, NM 87504


 
Rod Adair
 
Rod Adair Fortunately American womanhood* dodged a bullet in all of the "ridiculosity" that is the American presidential election "system." Both candidates were absurd as candidates and America finally shrugged and voted for change more than anything else. But the degree to which both candidates were utterly unfit for the office is nothing short of a tragedy.

*Identity-based choices are so clearly foolish as voting criteria, yet they are relentlessly pushed by those who (for logical reasons, admittedly) eschew issue-based decision-making.

However, for the sake of discussing and accepting it as a premise for the sake of this post, one should not want as a "role model" a person so documentably dishonest and violative of so many statutes and practices. She destroyed documents under subpoena. Why tell young girls she is "great." She is absolutely and indisputably NOT a role model. There are hundreds if not thousands of well-qualified, honest, intelligent women who could be president. It is foolish to hold this one up as the greatest when it is palpably untrue.
Like · Reply · 5 hrs
Melanie Sherman
 
Melanie Sherman I agree. She was completely fit for office and won the popular vote. Too bad the election was rigged.
Like · Reply · 1 · 5 hrs
Marianne Hook
 
Marianne Hook Rod, role models need not be perfect. And I think this post says that. However the smear campaigns mounted against this woman I believe were unprecedented. And if you think all of that had nothing to do with her being a woman you are choosing not to see this through other's eyes. But it comes right down to what this post said: she showed girls and women that they can aspire to do anything. And to remind them that although the road may not be smooth each woman that perseveres makes it better for the ones behind. Whether or not you agree with her politics makes no difference.
Like · Reply · 1 · 5 hrs
Rod Adair
 
Rod Adair I agree that her politics makes no difference. We just see these kinds of issues entirely differently. Cries of "ism" is the modern day first resort of a scoundrel. (And I don't mean you, as I know you are a woman of integrity, outstanding ability and achievement. But I do believe you are caught up in the hype and slogans of the political ideology to which you are attracted.) Women will never be "equal" or achieve at the level they should and deserve until they stop saying that every single setback, every single criticism, is a product of sexism. It isn't. I have read both of Margaret Thatcher's post-career memoirs, "The Path to Power" and "The Downing Street Years." Not once did she ever play the "gender card." In fact she found it revolting. She was either going to compete and beat men for party leadership or for prime minister or she wasn't. But she had nothing but contempt for the "because I'm a woman" whinery. America is a fascinating study of world views, of philosophies, of differing approaches based on all manner of demographics. It's part and parcel of the national cultural divide. Conservative families don't even raise their girls to require a role model, or to have to have a particular woman win something in order to be inspired. They actually teach their girls to be inspired by Lincoln, or Reagan, or even FDR---overcoming, achieving or whatever. But they don't base any of it on identity politics. They teach their kids to be inspired by ideas, not by sex, not by race, not by ethnicity. It is a huge divide, but at least people ought to understand that the divide exists.

 

Melanie Sherman I agree. When it doesn't go the way a woman wants, she should fire a bevy of immature tweets, and follow up by saying it was rigged. That is the way she can sink to being equal.
Like · Reply · 1 · 5 hrs
Fred Hofstetter
 
Fred Hofstetter What a bunch of condescending bullshit! God bless the scoundrels.
Like · Reply · 2 hrs
Rod Adair
Write a reply...
 
 
Rod Adair
 
Rod Adair And now for something more inspiring than the cult of demographic grievances:

“I want all the little girls out there to know that the lessons are very simple. Be kind your entire life

because all the kindness I showed to other people came back to me manifold in this campaign. And
secondly and most importantly, if you work hard and you get your shot one day, you too will shine.
You have to believe in yourself, don’t listen to the critics, don’t listen to the naysayers. You know
who you are. You’re beautiful, you’re smart, you can do it. That’s my message to all those little girls
dreaming out there.”

– Kellyanne Conway

(No “sexism,” no “misogyny,” no “racism,” no “bigotry,” or “something doin’ me in.” Just aspiration and inspiration.)
 
Elizabeth Ward Rod check yourself. For you to even suggest the HRC was unqualified or unfit for the presidency is absurd, especially in the face of a draft dodging, thrice married pussy grabber who has no understanding of laws or the constitution. Which makes me wonder what is behind this delusion you're under...
Like · Reply · 19 mins
Rod Adair
 
Rod Adair I think Trump is an appalling individual. I really do. It's been a difficult 18 months for me. It's been hard for me to figure out what is going on. But in the end, I guess I sort of get it. According to the internals of polls I've looked at, about 38% of Trump's voters were true believers in Trump, and about 62% are people like me who simply could not brook another 4 years of increasing danger internationally with folks who haven't a clue. Additionally, for me (and I realize not everyone cares---in many ways we are in a post-constitutional, post-principle world, to go with the obvious post-truth, post-moral, post-Christian Era everyone can see) it is simply insurmountable to destroy documents under subpoena. As someone who has had to testify in state and federal court on elections and redistricting issues, it is just unthinkable that an American public official, let alone an officer of the court would do that---and with nary a pang of conscience. What that means is that she would never have been accountable---she was yelling that at the top of her lungs. As for Trump, I hoped that he would appoint smart, honest people and give them a chance to succeed. It looks as though he is doing that. Probably there is a vaguely similar divide among Clinton voters---and you may well be one of her true believers. I don't wish her or you ill. I don't think people should be angry over any of this. At the same time, I think people should be realistic. Do I believe Trump actually did grab women by genitalia? No. Not really. I don't. Do I think he is a braggart? And someone who, quite perversely, might think that is something to "brag" about or boast about having done? Yeah, I do. Because he misleads all the time about an enormous range of things. So we had a face-off between two awful candidates. Just G-d-awful people. Awful awful awful candidates. And everyone had to make her or his choice. I think everyone should stop marching and howling at the moon and get on with life.
 
 
ABORTION
 
No automatic alt text available.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rod Adair Actually it has nothing to do with either of those things. Women have had access to abortion for 40 years, and the if-only-we had-a-"birds & the bees"-awareness program" has never been taken seriously as a sine qua non, nor has there ever been any data to support the idea that our $billions spent on information programs make any difference at all. (Don't get me wrong--They're considered fine and they're going to be there forever, but they don't have an impact on pregnancies.) The decreased abortion rate has been been observable and tracked for 25 years with almost all of it due to changes in how single-motherhood is viewed. It's now a first-alternative of choice for many millions.

So abortion rates are declining because more and more unintended pregnancies are being carried to term. Not because anyone is "smarter," or any "I am woman hear me roar" theme songs.

At any given moment nearly 40 percent of women are still using no birth-control method at all. As a result almost half of all American pregnancies are unintended.

While the pro-life movement has failed to do that much, it actually does seem to have changed American minds about the morality of abortion. While only about 20-30% of Americans wish to see abortion outlawed, between 40-50% now think abortion is "wrong." And now only 35 percent of Americans now describe abortion as “morally acceptable." All those factors explain the declining abortion rate, not the cliches.
 
 

Too, too true I am afraid.
I wasn't much of a fan of A Prairie Home Companion, but I do like Garrison Keillor as an observer and writer. (And Bill Smith don't jump on me for being a glass half-empty sort by not giving our dear president-elect a chance to prove all his wonderfulness.)

Garrison Keillor: And now we sit and watch in disbelief
He promised the swamp would be drained, Was elected, said “Rain!” and it rained And the old crocodiles Wore flesh-eating smiles And the turtles were well entertained. — It’s a wonderful satire right out of ...
SLTRIB.COM|BY GARRISON KEILLOR SPECIAL TO THE WASHINGTON POST
 
Like
Like
Love
Haha
Wow
Sad
Angry
CommentShare
88
Comments
Rod Adair
 
Rod Adair I've always been a fan of A Prairie Home Companion, despite Keillor's occasional lecturing. He's talented.
Like · Reply · 1 · December 9, 2016 at 5:36pm
Rod Adair
 
Rod Adair So what's your reaction to Angela Merkel's reversal on these Muslim women's get-ups being worn in public?
Like · Reply · December 9, 2016 at 6:11pm
Elizabeth Ward
 
Elizabeth Ward Rod, please don't just read the headlines. Merkel wants the full face veil, that allows only the eyes to be seen (these very often are women from Saudi Arabia). Hijabs, headscarves and modest clothing are not changed.
Like · Reply · December 9, 2016 at 6:50pm
Rod Adair
 
Rod Adair Elizabeth Ward I don't know what I wrote that in any way indicated I am only reading headlines.
Like · Reply · December 9, 2016 at 6:56pm
Rod Adair
Write a reply...
 
 
Nancy Burnham Boyd
 
Nancy Burnham Boyd I read this yesterday and oh so true. ??
Like · Reply · December 9, 2016 at 6:32pm
Marianne Hook
 
Marianne Hook Rod, I'm not sure. I think banning of the burka will only affect a very small number of people. We are only talking about the full-face veil, not the hijab or headscarf or long coat or abaya. I am betting very few Islamic women in Germany veil their faces. So what is the purpose? Is it so people can't disguise themselves or because it is Muslim? And if it is because they don't want people to look Muslim, than why not ban the hijab? If it is because they can't disguise themselves, then will masks or balaclavas be banned? And because it offends the German culture? What next? Forcing people to drink beer to show their loyalty to German culture? And at the same time I do think the burka is a symbol of female oppression. And, like so many other things in the world, women have become the scapegoats for a much bigger issue. Just get women to fall into line, and the problem is solved.
Like · Reply · December 9, 2016 at 6:34pm
Rod Adair
 
Rod Adair "Women, women, women." I have some other friends who obsess over identity politics, and see every single thing as some sort of demographic group being the issue, as opposed to actual policy discussions. (This is where, I believe---and I think many Democrats also believe this, including VP Biden, Bill Clinton, et al.---Democrats have wandered far afield, unable to communicate with too many voters. Many seem bent on doubling down on that kind of focus (and don't get me wrong---I hope they do) whilst others will try to draw the party back into communicating (which I hope they do not do).
Like · Reply · December 9, 2016 at 7:02pm
Marianne Hook
 
Marianne Hook "Women, women, women" as you say. Over half of the population of the world. Yet, for the most part, they are not the terrorists. They are not the violent members of gangs. They are not the MIddle Eastern immigrants groping women in Cologne last New Yea...See More
Like · Reply · 4 · December 9, 2016 at 10:45pm
Rod Adair
 
Rod Adair Marianne Hook I kind of think (I certainly hope) you realize my use of the word "women" was certainly not a criticism of women, but merely to emphasize how much is posted (much of it fake news) about women this and women that. Much of it over-the-top claims about all sorts of stuff.

As for what you just wrote, I can hardly make one head or one tail out of most of it. But I will say this: since I'm an 1854 Republican and was there when we passed the 14th Amendment in 1870 (with unanimous opposition from Democrats) I believe laws should be uniform and non-discriminatory. If we feel uncomfortable with Jesse James walking into a convenience store with a veil over his face, we can also feel uncomfortable if some woman does the same. We can also prevent that by law, if need be—for obvious reasons.

And thank you for getting away from some of your politically correct statements about Muslims—your "Middle Eastern immigrants groping women" comment is spot on. (And I know you were not referring to Ashkenazi Jews re-immigrating.)

As for being helpless punching bags? Not so sure—some of the most virulently hateful speech directed at Jews from people from the "Middle East" I see coming from women. And while the overwhelming percentage of terrorists are men, there are also documentaries showing mothers in Gaza teaching their children to hate Jews from before the time they can even walk.
Like · Reply · December 10, 2016 at 6:44pm
Rod Adair
Write a reply...
 
 
Elizabeth Ward
 
Elizabeth Ward if the cabinets picks are any indications of his wonderfulness, it will be a long 4 years. Drain the Swamp LOL he may have drained it but he's staffing much of his cabinet with the remains!
Like · Reply · December 9, 2016 at 6:50pm
Rod Adair
 
Rod Adair Since I just saw a message from Marianne Hook asking my take on the cabinet, I will say this: In 2002 I was the Lt. Gov. part of a ticket that got beat by the Democrat ticket (Bill Richardson and his Lt.Gov. running mate). At an early hearing on an appointee I broke with the critics (D & R) and called for approval. People were surprised---just because I had been running against him. But that's not the view of American polity I take. I believe an executive, chosen by the people merits considerable deference in his or her choices. We all want people on our team who believe in the same goals and objectives and who we believe can carry those out. Short of a nominee being involved in criminal activity or some other obvious disqualifier, a person should be able to assemble his or her team. We don't "hire" people to do a particular job then say--"No, you can't have your staff come in." So we should not do that with elected executive officials either. I personally believe executives deserve a grace period and their team. (It doesn't mean you shouldn't firmly oppose POLICIES, bills, proposals etc--or support them. But saying you can't have your own team is to deliberately try to make them fail. We should not do that.)
Like · Reply · December 9, 2016 at 7:15pm · Edited
Rod Adair
Write a reply...
 
 
William F. Smith
 
William F. Smith Hey Marianne. I'll be the first to criticize Trump if he screws up as PRESIDENT. Remember, I didn't vote for him (literally), I voted against Hillary. I don't like him, never did. But I won't play Carnac the Magnificent. He's getting briefed with ...See More
 
back to list
National Issues

National Issues

Democrats

2016 Presidential Campaign - Democrats

Republicans

2016 Presidential Campaign - Republicans

Jeb Bush gets religion.

"They said he got religion at the end, and I'm glad that he did."  — Tom T. Hall. The Year Clayton Delaney died.

Well, it's official.  Jeb Bush has changed quite of few of his positions on illegal immigration.  The single most significant is that he no longer endorses the "path to citizenship" for those who came here illegally. 

This is, after all, the key portion of any proposal aimed at "reforming" our existing illegal immigration situation.

No sensible citizen can see any point in trying to deport between 12 and 16 million people currently living in America illegally.  And no candidate for any office that we know of supports that.  What the average American wants is for the country to "get a handle on it."  They want it stopped, our borders secured and future illegal immigration prevented.  It is a national security issue.

The Path to Legal Status

The only way to accomplish the above goals, is to identify current illegal immigrants, get them accounted for, have them documented, and placed on a path to legal status.  Neither they nor their children or spouses should live in a state of fear or anxiety.

But a path to "citizenship" is not the right course.  It is not morally or legally correct.  A merciful and compassionate nation can provide the safeguards of legal status without sending the message to the rest of the world that all you have to do is cross our border and you will eventually get to become a citizen, thus circumventing the legal framework scores of millions of Americans have followed, honored and respected.

If someone who is granted legal status eventually wants to become a citizen, that person should have to return to his or her country of origin and wait in line like 20 million people around the world are doing at any given time.  Failing that, America will forever send the signal that anyone in the world can "jump the line," and that there is no reason at all to obey our immigration and naturalization laws.

We Like Jeb Bush

We are glad Jeb Bush has learned this lesson.  He is a fine speaker, and can eloquently explain his positions on complex issue.  If he were not named "Bush" he would be an actual top tier candidate—in all that that title would entail, including likelihood of acceptance and support of and from the American people in the primaries, and in any theoretical general election.  

We also recognize that he already is a de facto top-tier candidate because of his fame and his fundraising.

If he were to be the nominee of the Republican Party we would heartily support him and endorse him.  We hope, however, that he is not, as he does not give the center-right coalition the best chance of winning.

Media Watch

Media Watch

County Government News

County Government News

Cities, Towns and Villages

Cities, Towns and Villages

Judicial Watch

Judicial Watch

Movies, Television, Pop Culture

Movies, Television, Pop Culture

  • Movies, Television, Pop Culture
    Selma   ????? We have now seen the Oscar-nominated movie Selma.   Our earlier allusion to criticism that sounded as though it was in an Oliver Stone category for historical fabrication is some...

Sports

Sports

The Major League Baseball Playoffs are not realistic, and destroy the actual meaning of the sport. 

Major League Baseball is unique in this respect—its postseason is markedly different from the way the game is played normally.  No other major league sport suffers from this flaw.

Not that much is wrong with baseball. In some respects it's the most well thought-out sport there is.  The "perfect game" many aficionados say.

But the Major League Baseball postseason experience is unique in the world of professional sports, and not in a good way. 

In fact the playoffs are flawed in such a way as to detract from the sport itself and diminish the game and what it means to be the world champion of the sport. 

Among the Big Four team sports of North America: football, hockey, basketball and baseball—and all the 122 professional major league teams competing in the NFL, NHL, NBA and MLB respectively—it is in baseball alone that the postseason turns the sport itself on its head and makes it reflect something that it is not.  This article will explain why that happens and why it is wrong-headed.

 

Background on the The Frequency of Play

The 30 teams in both the National Hockey League and the National Basketball Association teams play a very similar schedule.  On average, each team has a day off between games, sometimes two days off.  Though there are back-to-back games, they are relatively infrequent.  NBA teams play between 14 and 22 back-to-back games a season, and for the NHL it usually ranges between 9 and 19. The NFL has a full week between games, the exception being the new Thursday games that each team plays once, leaving them only four days' rest once a year.

But baseball players play every single day.  Ten days straight, then a day off, then seven more games, then a day off, then ten more games.  Typically a baseball team plays 27 games every 30 days.  For the NHL and NBA it would be 14 per month, and for the NFL the number would be 4.

 

Getting to the Playoffs:  It's a grind

In all four sports, getting to the postseason requires a total team effort—in fact an all-out total organizational effort.  Teams must be deep, have bench strength and the capability of moving players in and out of the lineup, and on and off the roster, who can take the place of key players who go down for an injury, or who have to miss games for whatever reason.  While this is true of the other three major sports as well, it is most certainly even more of a concern for baseball teams because of the sheer volume of games in which a team must field a competitive lineup.

Each league's regular season* is a marathon, not a sprint.  NFL teams play for 17 weeks, 16 games.  The NHL has an 82-game season over six months, paralleled by an NBA season of 84 games over the same timeframe. Baseball is the biggest marathon of all—a true test of resilience and endurance—162 games usually starting around the beginning of April and finishing about the end of September.

NHL teams carry 23-man rosters, of which 20 can be active for any particular game.  The NBA is similar, with 15-man rosters of which 13 can be on the bench for a given game. In the NFL, the teams have 53 players on a roster, but only 46 can suit up on game day.  In Major League Baseball, teams have a 25-man active roster, and all 25 are at the park every day.

 

The Postseason Playoffs:  Sport by Sport

The National Football League:

Of the 32 teams, 12 qualify for the playoffs.  The playoffs are conducted in the exact same manner as the regular season.  Each team plays once a week, the exception being that the four top teams get the first week off.  For a typical qualifier to reach the Super Bowl, the team must play three consecutive weeks.  At that point both remaining teams have two weeks off before the Super Bowl.

In short, the playoffs, with a game each week, reflects the same means of advancement as is present in regular season grind.

The National Hockey League: 

16 of the 30 teams qualify for the postseason.  The playoffs are conducted in the exact same manner as the regular season: a game, a day off, a game, a day off, a game, a day off, and so on.  Just as in the regular season, there are occasionally two days off.  But the playoffs require the same stamina, the same approach as that required to make the playoffs.

 

The National Basketball Association

16 of the 30 teams qualify for the postseason.  The playoffs are conducted in the exact same manner as the regular season: a game, a day off, a game, a day off, a game, a day off, and so on.  Just as in the regular season, there are occasionally two days off.  But the playoffs require the same stamina, the same approach as that required to make the playoffs.

Major League Baseball

10 of the 30 teams qualify for the postseason.  (Although four of those teams qualify only for a one-game do-or-die play-in game.)

Here is where all similarity to baseball ends. 

Unlike the other three sports whose playoffs mirror the test of the regular season, and whose conditions are the same as the regular season, Major League Baseball playoffs in no way resemble the sport itself.  In hockey, basketball and football, the teams win playoff games and reach the pinacle of the sport in exactly the same way that they qualify to try to do so. 

Not so in baseball.  They are two entirely different concepts.  Teams make the playoffs only because they have depth, five-man pitching rotations and can play day-in and day-out at a high level.  But the baseball playoffs suddenly become a kind of "all-star" game within each team's roster.  MLB playoffs are conducted in a way that more closely follows the NBA and the NHL.  Teams have enormous numbers of days off. 

Here's the key point:  No Major League Baseball team could even qualify for the postseason if they played the same way during the regular season that they do in the playoffs.  None.

In the regular season Major League Baseball teams have to use a 5-man starting rotation, with pitchers pitching every 5th day.  There are not enough days off to have even a four-man rotation, let alone a team with three pitchers.  Even the best team in baseball using only a 4-man rotation, would wear them out, and most likely end up with a record of something like 66-96, or 70-92—and that would be if they were otherwise teh best team in the sport.

 

The 2014 Baseball Postseason is Typical

As examples, last year's World Series teams the Kansas City Royals played only 15 games in 30 days, and the San Francisco Giants played only 17 games in 30 days.  The 12 to 15 days off in the non-baseball fantasy world of the MLB postseason, means that teams can turn to three pitchers and give all of them plenty of rest.  But it isn't the way baseball really works.

At one point, the Royals had 5 consecutive days off, and the Giants had 4.  This never happens in the regular season.  Even the All-Star break is only three days.  Very rarely is there anything beyond a one-day break, and even that happens only a couple of times a month. 

What this means is that neither team used the team that got them to the playoffs.  (The NFL, NBA and NHL teams ALL used the very same teams that got them to the playoffs.) 

Baseball teams use a three-man pitching rotation in the playoffs.  Sometimes, they essentially opt for two pitchers only—conceding the likelihood that some of their games are going to be lost—when their third-, or rarely fourth-best pitcher has to face one of their opponents' two-man or three-man rotation members. 

Imagine an NFL team using only one running back and three wide receivers, instead of rotating through their roster in the course of a playoff game—or using only 4 defensive backs and 4 linebackers, instead of rotating 8 or 9 DBs and 6 or 7 linebackers?  In hockey, would a team use only two or three of their forward lines?  Would an NBA team use only the starting five?  They would never make the post season if they tried to present that product to their fans during the regular season.

Those are the equivalents of what Major League Baseball sets up every fall.  No other sport drags its playoffs out in such a way as to completely change the playing field—completely change the dynamics of its game.

Why Does Baseball Do This?

MLB does this because the TV networks want to drag out the games so that they can try to have one game each day  This requires an unnecessary staggering of games, and creates the phenomenon of 15 off-days in a month.

What about travel days?

What about them?  Baseball has travel days constantly.  A team may play in Chicago one day and in Miami the next, or in New York one day and Phoenix the very next day.  Travel days as a routine part of the game are again, a phenomenon of television, and stretching out the playoffs.

In years past, travel days were employed only when necessary. The famous "subway series" games were played on seven consecutive days.  Why?  Because there was no "travel day" required to go from Brooklyn to the Bronx.  Today, they would put in artificial travel days.

Even fairly long train trips didn't necessarily matter.  The 1948 World Series between the Cleveland Indians and the Boston Braves was played in six consecutive days, October 6 & 7 in Boston, October 8, 9 & 10 in Cleveland, and October 11 back in Boston.

This reflects actual baseball, the way the teams play day-in and day-out, and the kind of unique test that baseball presents to its athletes, its managers and management, and to its fans.

In the modern world of charter planes, teams fly from coast to coast to play games on consecutive days.  The artificial "travel day" should be eliminated so that teams can play in the playoffs in the same way that got them there in the first place.


*All these leagues also have pre-seasons and training camps, which add an additional 6-8 weeks to each player's year.


Email us with your feedback, comments, questions and ideas. 

Religious Issues

Religious Issues

  • Religious Issues
    Coming Soon

Copyright New Mexico Political Journal 2015
EMAIL US WITH YOUR FEEDBACK, COMMENTS, QUESTIONS AND IDEAS

.

Loading...