New Mexico Political Journal
mobile icon
New Mexico Political Journal

.

Show Subnavigation
  • Home
  • About NMPJ
    • About
    • Editor
  • Feedback
  • Advertise on NMPJ

FacebookTwitter

If you read New Mexico Political Journal from a Facebook link, and appreciate the coverage of events, please “like” NMPJ on Facebook.

Will the Governor End Voter ID in Four New Mexico Cities? Off-year "Local Elections" Bill has some Good Ideas and some Very Bad Ideas. But did Senator Ivey-Soto get too Greedy?

04/07/2017

House Bill 174 is called the Local Election Act. Its aim is to provide a single election day — in November of odd-numbered years — for a huge array of relatively small local elections that currently take place across a wide range of dates, everywhere around the state, virtually year-round.

These are non-partisan elections, the most important of which are the municipal elections that elect city councilors, city commissioners, town and village trustees, municipal judges, and mayors in most of New Mexico's 106 incorporated cities, towns, and villages. 

Currently municipal elections are held on the first Tuesday in March of even-numbered years, except for certain "Home-rule" cities that have opted out of that uniform date — Albuquerque being one of those that has done so. These Home Rule cities may have elections in odd-numbered years at randomly scattered dates and times they've selected.

School districts on the other hand, hold their elections on the first Tuesday in February of odd-numbered years. And there are 89 school districts.

Additionally, there are numerous special districts, including various cooperatives, soil and water districts, utility districts, hospital districts, mutual domestic water associations, and on and on.

Consolidating all those election has a good side, although usurping the power of local school boards and other governing bodies has a downside.

The Bad: Killing Voter ID

In our view, co-sponsor (and Democratic Party apparatchik) Senator Daniel Ivey-Soto (D-Albuquerque) has seized the opportunity to take direct aim at one of the Democratic Party's most hated laws: the idea that voters might decide that they'd like to be required to show an ID in order to protect the integrity of their local elections.

Democrats prefer that the adoption or prohibition of such public policies be directed by a judge (in fact they prefer judge-made public policy for virtually all areas of the law) and they have fought legislative adoption of Voter ID with demonic fervor — and they absolutely hate it when actual voters or city councilors adopt Voter ID through the democratic process.

In New Mexico, there is hardly anything that Democrats hate more than the fact that Albuquerque voters went to the polls in 2005 and adopted Voter ID by a landslide 3 to 1 margin.

At least four New Mexico municipalities, Albuquerque, Rio Rancho, Clovis, and Hobbs, have adopted Voter ID for their municipal elections — something they can control. But with House Bill 174 rolling as many as a half dozen elections into one, the ability to separate the municipal election and maintain the Voter ID requirement is lost forever.

We can see Ivey-Soto and his Democratic peers in the legislature as well as the operatives at the Democratic Party of New Mexico calling Chuck Schumer and Tom Perez, as well as Senator Elizabeth Warren and bragging about how New Mexico killed their most hated public policy in one easy subterfuge — a poison pill added to a "reform" bill.

Democrats claim they've offered an "opt-out" provision that allows municipalities to not participate. But that means the towns will have to adopt an ordinance or resolution doing so. Given the pressure applied by the modern American Left now (just look at the US Senate for a moment to get a feel for it) it is inconceivable the Albuquerque City Council would not jump at the opportunity to kill Voter ID. They would not opt-out, and that means Albuquerque will never again have Voter ID.

They want to brag, using their ridiculous and anti-intellectual argument (the kind that insults the voters to their faces) that they have repealed the "racist" Voter ID requirement." Given the opportunity to make a big scene out of it, they will not be able to resist.

 OTHER BAD PROVISIONS

  • The bill gives authority to county commissions over virtually all elections of all kinds — including organizations and entities that they should have nothing to do with.
  • All the analyses of this bill openly admit that there is insufficient funding the pay for the provisions of the bill itself.
  • The bill leaves local governments having to pay the costs associated with compiling and consolidating elections across numerous jurisdictions. That's not something they currently have to pay for. 
  • Small jurisdictions don't currently upload results to a central system.  Now they will have to pay to support the central system that will compile all of these results.
  • The bill provides for the Secretary of State or county clerks to "weigh-in" on ballot questions by providing their own versions of "analysis." We aren't so sure how "objective" that may turn out to be. Better to let the voters weigh in themselves.
  • The bill provides for "run-off" elections — an old Democrat Party provision from their control of the "Solid South" and the Democrat Party's public policy of segregation and Jim Crow laws that kept blacks from possibly winning Democratic Party primaries. New Mexico has a long tradition of opposing runoff elections — to counter the very reasons Democrats traditionally wanted them. (It is significant to note that the modern Left that governs Albuquerque has returned to these old Democratic Party "principles" in recent years, but that flies in the face of New Mexico's better instincts, and better angels of our nature.)

Finally, there are so many jurisdictions with an amazing array of requirements — including requirements that certain districts allow voting by only those voters who are property owners, deed owners, or otherwise somehow "members" of the association or district in question. Regular qualified voters who don't meet those requirements are not permitted to vote. We strongly doubt the ability of the elections administration to ensure that ineligible voters can be weeded out.

We are aware that in the last election numerous voters who registered — many months before the deadline — at the Motor Vehicle Division and Human Services Department did not make it on to the voter rolls. If these voters got to vote at all, their only recourse was to vote by provisional ballot. If the Secretary of State cannot process the thousands of voters currently registering, how can that office take on the massively more complex requirements detailed in this bill?

We have no idea how the governor will view this bill, and she is probably under great pressure from special interest groups, and possibly the Municipal League, School Boards Associations, Teacher's Unions, and all manner of lobbyists, to sign this bill.

We hope she vetoes it.


Intelligent Political Discourse—for the Thoughtful New Mexican

 

 

back to list
National Issues

National Issues

Democrats

2016 Presidential Campaign - Democrats

Republicans

2016 Presidential Campaign - Republicans

Jeb Bush gets religion.

"They said he got religion at the end, and I'm glad that he did."  — Tom T. Hall. The Year Clayton Delaney died.

Well, it's official.  Jeb Bush has changed quite of few of his positions on illegal immigration.  The single most significant is that he no longer endorses the "path to citizenship" for those who came here illegally. 

This is, after all, the key portion of any proposal aimed at "reforming" our existing illegal immigration situation.

No sensible citizen can see any point in trying to deport between 12 and 16 million people currently living in America illegally.  And no candidate for any office that we know of supports that.  What the average American wants is for the country to "get a handle on it."  They want it stopped, our borders secured and future illegal immigration prevented.  It is a national security issue.

The Path to Legal Status

The only way to accomplish the above goals, is to identify current illegal immigrants, get them accounted for, have them documented, and placed on a path to legal status.  Neither they nor their children or spouses should live in a state of fear or anxiety.

But a path to "citizenship" is not the right course.  It is not morally or legally correct.  A merciful and compassionate nation can provide the safeguards of legal status without sending the message to the rest of the world that all you have to do is cross our border and you will eventually get to become a citizen, thus circumventing the legal framework scores of millions of Americans have followed, honored and respected.

If someone who is granted legal status eventually wants to become a citizen, that person should have to return to his or her country of origin and wait in line like 20 million people around the world are doing at any given time.  Failing that, America will forever send the signal that anyone in the world can "jump the line," and that there is no reason at all to obey our immigration and naturalization laws.

We Like Jeb Bush

We are glad Jeb Bush has learned this lesson.  He is a fine speaker, and can eloquently explain his positions on complex issue.  If he were not named "Bush" he would be an actual top tier candidate—in all that that title would entail, including likelihood of acceptance and support of and from the American people in the primaries, and in any theoretical general election.  

We also recognize that he already is a de facto top-tier candidate because of his fame and his fundraising.

If he were to be the nominee of the Republican Party we would heartily support him and endorse him.  We hope, however, that he is not, as he does not give the center-right coalition the best chance of winning.

Media Watch

Media Watch

County Government News

County Government News

Cities, Towns and Villages

Cities, Towns and Villages

Judicial Watch

Judicial Watch

Movies, Television, Pop Culture

Movies, Television, Pop Culture

  • Movies, Television, Pop Culture
    Selma   ????? We have now seen the Oscar-nominated movie Selma.   Our earlier allusion to criticism that sounded as though it was in an Oliver Stone category for historical fabrication is some...

Sports

Sports

The Major League Baseball Playoffs are not realistic, and destroy the actual meaning of the sport. 

Major League Baseball is unique in this respect—its postseason is markedly different from the way the game is played normally.  No other major league sport suffers from this flaw.

Not that much is wrong with baseball. In some respects it's the most well thought-out sport there is.  The "perfect game" many aficionados say.

But the Major League Baseball postseason experience is unique in the world of professional sports, and not in a good way. 

In fact the playoffs are flawed in such a way as to detract from the sport itself and diminish the game and what it means to be the world champion of the sport. 

Among the Big Four team sports of North America: football, hockey, basketball and baseball—and all the 122 professional major league teams competing in the NFL, NHL, NBA and MLB respectively—it is in baseball alone that the postseason turns the sport itself on its head and makes it reflect something that it is not.  This article will explain why that happens and why it is wrong-headed.

 

Background on the The Frequency of Play

The 30 teams in both the National Hockey League and the National Basketball Association teams play a very similar schedule.  On average, each team has a day off between games, sometimes two days off.  Though there are back-to-back games, they are relatively infrequent.  NBA teams play between 14 and 22 back-to-back games a season, and for the NHL it usually ranges between 9 and 19. The NFL has a full week between games, the exception being the new Thursday games that each team plays once, leaving them only four days' rest once a year.

But baseball players play every single day.  Ten days straight, then a day off, then seven more games, then a day off, then ten more games.  Typically a baseball team plays 27 games every 30 days.  For the NHL and NBA it would be 14 per month, and for the NFL the number would be 4.

 

Getting to the Playoffs:  It's a grind

In all four sports, getting to the postseason requires a total team effort—in fact an all-out total organizational effort.  Teams must be deep, have bench strength and the capability of moving players in and out of the lineup, and on and off the roster, who can take the place of key players who go down for an injury, or who have to miss games for whatever reason.  While this is true of the other three major sports as well, it is most certainly even more of a concern for baseball teams because of the sheer volume of games in which a team must field a competitive lineup.

Each league's regular season* is a marathon, not a sprint.  NFL teams play for 17 weeks, 16 games.  The NHL has an 82-game season over six months, paralleled by an NBA season of 84 games over the same timeframe. Baseball is the biggest marathon of all—a true test of resilience and endurance—162 games usually starting around the beginning of April and finishing about the end of September.

NHL teams carry 23-man rosters, of which 20 can be active for any particular game.  The NBA is similar, with 15-man rosters of which 13 can be on the bench for a given game. In the NFL, the teams have 53 players on a roster, but only 46 can suit up on game day.  In Major League Baseball, teams have a 25-man active roster, and all 25 are at the park every day.

 

The Postseason Playoffs:  Sport by Sport

The National Football League:

Of the 32 teams, 12 qualify for the playoffs.  The playoffs are conducted in the exact same manner as the regular season.  Each team plays once a week, the exception being that the four top teams get the first week off.  For a typical qualifier to reach the Super Bowl, the team must play three consecutive weeks.  At that point both remaining teams have two weeks off before the Super Bowl.

In short, the playoffs, with a game each week, reflects the same means of advancement as is present in regular season grind.

The National Hockey League: 

16 of the 30 teams qualify for the postseason.  The playoffs are conducted in the exact same manner as the regular season: a game, a day off, a game, a day off, a game, a day off, and so on.  Just as in the regular season, there are occasionally two days off.  But the playoffs require the same stamina, the same approach as that required to make the playoffs.

 

The National Basketball Association

16 of the 30 teams qualify for the postseason.  The playoffs are conducted in the exact same manner as the regular season: a game, a day off, a game, a day off, a game, a day off, and so on.  Just as in the regular season, there are occasionally two days off.  But the playoffs require the same stamina, the same approach as that required to make the playoffs.

Major League Baseball

10 of the 30 teams qualify for the postseason.  (Although four of those teams qualify only for a one-game do-or-die play-in game.)

Here is where all similarity to baseball ends. 

Unlike the other three sports whose playoffs mirror the test of the regular season, and whose conditions are the same as the regular season, Major League Baseball playoffs in no way resemble the sport itself.  In hockey, basketball and football, the teams win playoff games and reach the pinacle of the sport in exactly the same way that they qualify to try to do so. 

Not so in baseball.  They are two entirely different concepts.  Teams make the playoffs only because they have depth, five-man pitching rotations and can play day-in and day-out at a high level.  But the baseball playoffs suddenly become a kind of "all-star" game within each team's roster.  MLB playoffs are conducted in a way that more closely follows the NBA and the NHL.  Teams have enormous numbers of days off. 

Here's the key point:  No Major League Baseball team could even qualify for the postseason if they played the same way during the regular season that they do in the playoffs.  None.

In the regular season Major League Baseball teams have to use a 5-man starting rotation, with pitchers pitching every 5th day.  There are not enough days off to have even a four-man rotation, let alone a team with three pitchers.  Even the best team in baseball using only a 4-man rotation, would wear them out, and most likely end up with a record of something like 66-96, or 70-92—and that would be if they were otherwise teh best team in the sport.

 

The 2014 Baseball Postseason is Typical

As examples, last year's World Series teams the Kansas City Royals played only 15 games in 30 days, and the San Francisco Giants played only 17 games in 30 days.  The 12 to 15 days off in the non-baseball fantasy world of the MLB postseason, means that teams can turn to three pitchers and give all of them plenty of rest.  But it isn't the way baseball really works.

At one point, the Royals had 5 consecutive days off, and the Giants had 4.  This never happens in the regular season.  Even the All-Star break is only three days.  Very rarely is there anything beyond a one-day break, and even that happens only a couple of times a month. 

What this means is that neither team used the team that got them to the playoffs.  (The NFL, NBA and NHL teams ALL used the very same teams that got them to the playoffs.) 

Baseball teams use a three-man pitching rotation in the playoffs.  Sometimes, they essentially opt for two pitchers only—conceding the likelihood that some of their games are going to be lost—when their third-, or rarely fourth-best pitcher has to face one of their opponents' two-man or three-man rotation members. 

Imagine an NFL team using only one running back and three wide receivers, instead of rotating through their roster in the course of a playoff game—or using only 4 defensive backs and 4 linebackers, instead of rotating 8 or 9 DBs and 6 or 7 linebackers?  In hockey, would a team use only two or three of their forward lines?  Would an NBA team use only the starting five?  They would never make the post season if they tried to present that product to their fans during the regular season.

Those are the equivalents of what Major League Baseball sets up every fall.  No other sport drags its playoffs out in such a way as to completely change the playing field—completely change the dynamics of its game.

Why Does Baseball Do This?

MLB does this because the TV networks want to drag out the games so that they can try to have one game each day  This requires an unnecessary staggering of games, and creates the phenomenon of 15 off-days in a month.

What about travel days?

What about them?  Baseball has travel days constantly.  A team may play in Chicago one day and in Miami the next, or in New York one day and Phoenix the very next day.  Travel days as a routine part of the game are again, a phenomenon of television, and stretching out the playoffs.

In years past, travel days were employed only when necessary. The famous "subway series" games were played on seven consecutive days.  Why?  Because there was no "travel day" required to go from Brooklyn to the Bronx.  Today, they would put in artificial travel days.

Even fairly long train trips didn't necessarily matter.  The 1948 World Series between the Cleveland Indians and the Boston Braves was played in six consecutive days, October 6 & 7 in Boston, October 8, 9 & 10 in Cleveland, and October 11 back in Boston.

This reflects actual baseball, the way the teams play day-in and day-out, and the kind of unique test that baseball presents to its athletes, its managers and management, and to its fans.

In the modern world of charter planes, teams fly from coast to coast to play games on consecutive days.  The artificial "travel day" should be eliminated so that teams can play in the playoffs in the same way that got them there in the first place.


*All these leagues also have pre-seasons and training camps, which add an additional 6-8 weeks to each player's year.


Email us with your feedback, comments, questions and ideas. 

Religious Issues

Religious Issues

  • Religious Issues
    Coming Soon

Copyright New Mexico Political Journal 2015
EMAIL US WITH YOUR FEEDBACK, COMMENTS, QUESTIONS AND IDEAS

.

Loading...