New Mexico Political Journal
mobile icon
New Mexico Political Journal

.

Show Subnavigation
  • Home
  • About NMPJ
    • About
    • Editor
  • Feedback
  • Advertise on NMPJ

FacebookTwitter

If you read New Mexico Political Journal from a Facebook link, and appreciate the coverage of events, please “like” NMPJ on Facebook.

2018 New Mexico Election Outlook (Part 2): The State House of Representatives. Background. Key Battleground Districts. Potential Changes, Upsets. Incumbents in Trouble?

11/02/2018

First, Let's Look at the Lay of the Land

Democrats hold a 38-32 advantage coming into this General Election. In 2016, they knocked off five Republicans to re-capture the House only two years after the Republicans ended 60 years of Democrat control.

In 2014 the Republicans had turned a 31-39 deficit in the state House of Representatives into a 37-33 majority by capturing six seats. This was a huge feat because there are only about 16 competitive seats in the whole state. The other 54 are fairly solidly Democrat or Republican.

A Little bit of Background

The Crucial Role of Redistricting

One major reason Republicans won control of the legislature in 2014 was the multi-cycle effort by Governor Martinez to assist legislative candidates. In 2011, she vetoed Democrat gerrymander redistricting plans, forcing the Democrats to take her to court. By hiring competent lawyers, and with the assistance of then-party chairman Monty Newman, the judge adopted the Governor’s proposed map for the State House.

2012

Then in 2012, she raised and spent over $2 million helping GOP legislative candidates. She defeated Democrat Senate President Tim Jennings, despite Jennings being supported by future GOP Committeeman Harvey Yates and other Republicans. While Republicans did not win control of the House that year, they protected enough close GOP seats that it set the table for 2014.

Incidentally, those legislative victories achieved by the Martinez Super-PAC — including the defeat of a few progressives in Democrat primaries — led to the passage of the 2013 Tax Reform package that cut corporate income tax rates and led to companies like Facebook coming to New Mexico, as well as the expansion of Intel and now the arrival of Netflix.

2014

Moving to 2014, a major reason the GOP won control of the state House was a turnout operation created and driven by Governor Susana Martinez's re-election campaign and its legislative Super-PAC.  We all know Democrats hold a voter registration edge in New Mexico and in most of the competitive House seats. The key to success for Republicans is to turnout Republican voters at a greater rate than their share of the registration.

In 2014 Republicans not only turned out Republicans at a level considerably above their registration share, they coupled that turnout operation with strong persuasive messaging targeted at independents and moderate Democrats. The result was not only a landslide victory for Martinez, but a net gain of those six House seats. 

Martinez Decided to Adopt a Unique Role in New Mexico History

I must be noted that no governor in New Mexico history—in either party—had ever raised money for a team effort, trying to sweep other party members into office. Neither had extremely powerful and influential senators. Like most politicians, popular governors like Gary Johnson and Bill Richardson, and popular senators like Jeff Bingaman and Pete Domenici, raised money for themselves and spent it on their own races. Martinez was cut from a different cloth. 

Martinez, through her work to raise money for super-PACs like Reform New Mexico Now, Advance New Mexico Now, and Susana PAC, along with her own campaign, not only poured several million dollars into legislative races, she brought in big-names to hold turnout rallies which she strategically placed in competitive districts. Mitt Romney appearing in Conrad James's district is but one example. Chris Christie in Sharon Clahchischiliage's district is another.

Martinez SuperPACs

Martinez's independent expenditure committees additionally sent about 15 pieces of mail in each district in support of Republican candidates—and sometimes as many as 25 to 30. She also geared her own advertising to messages that were seen as decisive in a number of Republican races. As an example, she left her "drivers' licenses" ads up for the last three weeks of the campaign, precisely because the issue was helping Republican legislative campaigns. 

Martinez Turnout Operations

Martinez also had a turnout effort that was unprecedented. It included hundreds of volunteers carrying out neighbor-to-neighbor and peer to peer, door-to-door, phone call and personal contact campaigns. She mailed hundreds of thousands of absentee ballot applications and launched the same numbers of personal phone calls. 

Her operation was so successful that the Republican National Committee adopted much of what was called the "Martinez Model" for the 2016 effort headed up by Reince Priebus that turned out to be the keys to Trump victories in Florida, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Iowa, North Carolina, and Arizona. 

2016

For us, it appears ironic that while the Martinez Model was so effective in New Mexico that it was used nationally, certain Republican leaders like Harvey Yates and those running the SuperPAC called "GOAL" decided they did not want to use it anymore. Yates was convinced that he and Ryan Cangiolosi could run a more comprehensive and effective statewide effort. They didn't however. 

Martinez Pushed to the Sidelines

Convincing House Majority Leader Nate Gentry and his assistants Representatives Rod Montoya and Kelly Fajardo that Martinez should be forced to the sidelines, Yates, Cangiolosi and the legislative leaders took charge, apparently more happy to "be in control" than to "develop a plan."

What followed was a disaster of Hindenburg-like proportions—at least to New Mexico Republicans who had waited 60 years—60 years!—to capture the House, only to see it handed back because certain people wanted to be in charge. This has left a number of Republicans angry, but more importantly perhaps, demoralized. 60 years of work.

Martinez's Republican-supporting PACs had raised and spent over $4 million to help elect Republicans in New Mexico. That’s a jaw-dropping figure that we don’t believe that many New Mexico Republicans fully appreciate. $4 million in fundraising—to be spent on others, not herself—the only effort of its kind in New Mexico history. All of it thrown away because three or four people "didn't like" the governor. 

As neutral observers, we see that as tragic. We would be of the same opinion if a similar dynamic had occurred in the Democrat Party.

2018

As for this coming Tuesday, we will see if the Republican Party of New Mexico has it in them to get out the vote. We were concerned that there was only a little over $1,500 on hand a few days ago, and that it appeared that neither Yates, nor any of his partners, had done anything at all to replace Governor Martinez's three PACs. 

Meanwhile, the main Democrat SuperPAC operating in New Mexico, "Patriot Majority," has spent nearly $2 million attacking Republicans. The secondary SuperPAC, run by the teachers' union, has spent almost $500,000 attacking Republicans. 

This SuperPAC advantage has led to what we have seen in post offices around the state: Republican legislative candidates being beaten to death with daily negative mail in support of their Democrat opponents. The ratios are running 5 or 6 to 1 in favor of the Democrats. Republican candidates may survive, but the silence of the Republican Party of New Mexico, and the absence of independent expenditures on behalf of the GOP make it difficult to go on with political life.

In any case, let's take a look at the political landscape of the New Mexico House of Representatives going into Tuesday's election.

KEY DISTRICTS

The following districts have changed hands frequently over the past decade, some of them four times, some have switched back and forth three times. Most remain a part of the battleground districts.

House District 15 OPEN SEAT (Albuquerque's North Valley)

Republican Brad Winter v. Democrat Hayan Hochman

This is the old Raymond Sanchez district, won by John Sanchez in 2000, then held by Teresa Zanetti in 2002 when Sanchez stepped down to run for governor, then taken back in the Obama landslide by Democrat Bill O'Neill (now state senator), held by Emily Kane, then recaptured by Republican Sarah Maestas Barnes in 2014. Maestas Barnes won it again in 2016, but is stepping down. 

The Republicans have put up Brad Winter, former Albuquerque School Superintendent, and current City Council member. As of 8 October, Winter had $18,436 on hand compared to his Democrat opponent Dayan Hochman's $51,564. As of yesterday, Hochman had outraised Winter $133k to $84k, and had outspent his Republican opponent during October $55k to $25k. He also had more cash on hand than Winter, $45k to $22k.

Two years ago, Clinton beat Trump in the district 6,904 to 5,537, with Gary Johnson getting 1,535. Trump's 38.84% was below his statewide showing of 40.04%. All observers we have spoken with believe Winter will win, based on his very high name recognition. But this could be a sleeper.

House District 23 (Part of NW Albuquerque and part of Sandoval County)

Incumbent Democrat Damon Ely v. Republican Brenda Boatman

This seat was held by the late Republican Eric Youngberg, but was captured by Democrat Ben Rodefer in 2008, retaken by Republican Dave Doyle in 2010, held by Paul Pacheco in 2012 and 2014, until 2016, when he lost it to Ely, 7,127 to 7,022. Hillary ran more weakly here, and Trump slightly stronger than in District 15. Yet it seems Republicans may not have viewed the 105-vote loss as a key return target. On October 8, Ely had over $70k to Boatman's $11,000. And Ely has outspent Boatman $166k to $63k. 

House District 24 (Albuquerque's mid-NE Heights)

Incumbent Democrat Liz Thomson v. Republican Trey Stephen Morris

Republican congressional nominee Janice Arnold-Jones once held this seat. She was succeeded by Conrad James in 2010, but he lost it to Thomson in 2012, recapturing it in 2014, only to see it go back to Thomson in 2016 when James elected not to run again. Thomson defeated Christina Marie Hall by 600 votes while Hillary Clinton was trouncing Trump by 1,412. Thomson has outspent Morris $128k to $52k. It appears Republicans may have given up hope here. 

In 2014, the Martinez effort held the Democrat turnout advantage to only 8 percentage points (47% to 39%) and James won the seat. That wasn't matched in 2016. And under today's RPNM turnout operation, the Democrats hold an almost 20 percentage point advantage in early voting (52% to 33%).

House District 36 (Las Cruces, and northern villages including Hatch)

Democrat incumbent Nathan Small v. Republican David Tofsted

This was once a heavily competitive seat and in fact it has changed hands the last three consecutive elections. But with Doña Ana County's strong leftward migration it appears the days of competitive elections are gone. The Republican nominee has raised only $15,000 and the Democrat, whose wife Xochitl is running for Congress, has spent $79,000 in this district where Hillary beat Trump by 1,000 votes and over 10 percentage points. In any case, the GOP candidate is getting little help.

House District 37 (Las Cruces)

Incumbent Democrat Joanne Ferrary v. Republican Bev Courtney

This is another district that reflects the strong organizing (some say cheating and violations of election law) in Doña Ana County by the hard Left of the Democratic Party. In 2010, Dr. Terry McMillan captured this seat for the GOP from Jeff Steinborn, and held it in 2012 and 2014 against furious onslaughts by Ferrary who lost twice, by 8 votes and 409 votes respectively. But Ferrary came roaring back for a third bite at the apple in 2016. It proved the charm, with the Democrat winning by 723 votes while Clinton was pounding Trump by 1,400. This year the Republican candidate has spent only $3,600 to Ferrary's $98,000. Enough said.

House District 39 (Silver City, part of Grant County pt. Doña Ana County)

Incumbent Democrat Rodolpho Martinez v. Republican Lee S. Cotter

Rodolpho "Rudy" Martinez has held this district since taking over from the late Manuel Herrera in 2007. But he lost it in 2014 to Republican John Zimmerman, who, in 2016, lost it back to Rudy by 2.2 points while Trump was getting beat by 7 points. Zimmerman opted to run for the Doña Ana County Commission, and Republicans nominated former State Senator Lee Cotter. But as of yesterday, Cotter has spent only 11 grand compared to the more than $90,000 Martinez has raised. 

House District 53 (East Doña Ana County, Chaparral, one Pct in Otero County)

Incumbent Republican Rick Little v. Democrat Willie Madrid

This is a rematch of the 2016 contest. Little captured the seat from Democrat Nate Cote in 2010, lost it back to him in 2012, and retook the seat in 2014. This is closely contested again, although reports have surfaced of a massive (again, possibly illegal) voter registration effort by Democrats in the fast-growing, unincorporated town of Chaparral, which stretches across the Doña Ana-Otero border. Clinton beat Trump here by 6½ points, although for Trump that was a better showing than average. Little has raised almost $72,000 and Madrid almost $79,000

OTHER DISTRICTS of NOTE

House District 28 (Albuquerque NE Heights)

Democrats have told NMPJ they are going to take this seat from incumbent Republican Jimmie Hall. This seems implausible to us, with Hall having held the seat for 14 years and running mostly unopposed during that time. He beat activist Democrat Cornelia Lange in 2010 with 61% of the vote, but the district has changed since then, and the NE Heights have become increasingly less friendly to Republicans over the past generation.

Clinton beat Trump here by only one point, with Gary Johnson getting 12%, so we're still from Missouri on this one. But Democrats point to their attractive candidate Melanie Ann Stansbury, and point out that she has raised $176,113, while Hall has received $95,313. They also claim she has run an exceptional campaign, working tirelessly, knocking on every door, and has a host of volunteers. We'll see.

House District 29 (NW Albuquerque)

Incumbent Republican David Adkins won re-election two years ago by only 9 votes, 6,977 to 6,968, in a district Clinton carried by 550 votes. But our reporters/readers (Democrats and Republicans) tell us Adkins is taking the race seriously this time and is working hard, something he apparently did not do last time. He has raised almost $140,000, but his Democrat challenger, Joy Garratt has raised almost $125,000. So both are running vigorous campaigns. 

In House District 29, Democrats only had a 1 percentage point advantage over Republicans in 2014. That was greatly reduced in 2016. Today, the Democrats have a 15 percentage point advantage (50% to 35%).

House District 30 (Albuquerque, near NE Heights)

This seat was held by Republican Justine Fox-Young who captured the seat in 2004, but was swept out in the Obama landslide of 2008. Two years later Nate Gentry recaptured the seat and held it against furious attacks and hundreds of thousands of dollars of spending, which he matched. He is retiring, and the Republicans have nominated John Jones, husband of Congressional candidate Janice Arnold-Jones (something close to a mirror image of the HD 36 situation). 

Democrats have re-nominated Natalie Figueroa, who ran a competitive race against Gentry two years ago, while Hillary was pounding Trump by nearly 11 points. She has outraised Jones $126,000 to 70 grand. 

House District 32 (Luna County, plus Hidaldo, and one Pct in Grant)

This district has been a continuously missed opportunity for the Republicans for close to 20 years. In 2016, Hillary lost the district by 300 votes, with 43.9%. An excellent Republican candidate lost the district to Democrat Candie Sweetser because the losing primary candidate ran a non-stop negative campaign against her in the fall, dividing the Republican vote. This year Sweetser faces Republican Laura Boyd. But it appears the RPNM has placed little emphasis on this eminently winnable district. Boyd has spent only $26,000. Sweetser has raised $61,000. Is it yet another opportunity lost?

House District 63 (East Central NM, Santa Rosa to Clovis)

This district is unique in the state in that it is the only house district held by a Democrat where Trump actually won. Not only did he win, Trump won an absolute majority, beating Clinton 3,779 to 2,706, capturing 51.3% to Clinton's 36.7%. Trump carried only 25 house districts to Clinton's 45, and of those he won majorities in only 15. This is one of them.

It is truly a strange anomaly for the Democrats to hold one of the 15 strongest Republican districts in the state. Still, incumbent George Dodge of Santa Rosa works the district hard, and he has the biggest base in the Guadalupe County seat. Martin Zamora, however, is perhaps the first truly serious Republican challenger in possibly the past 20 years or so. He is widely respected and has raised over $101,000. Dodge has raised $144,000.

An upset is possible.

House District 68 (NW Albuquerque)

Incumbent Monica Youngblood has been treated very unfairly, both in media as well as in court, in the wake of her dubious arrest for alleged drunk driving last May. (See our comprehensive coverage of the story in our May 25 issue.) Still, emotionalism and sensationalism often triumph in politics, so we are reasonably sure she is facing a tough re-election challenge.

Clinton carried this district by 190 votes in 2016, beating Trump by about one-half percent. Fundraising has been highly competitive: Democrat Karen Bash has raised $86,000 to Youngblood's $101,000. Bash is said to be a Christian minister, something increasingly rare in the Democratic Party, which over the past quarter century has become steadily more hostile to people of faith (except to Muslims, whom they unquestioningly embrace). Bash's website is a study in vagueness, so we are left unsure of where she stands on much. 

We would guess that she is not what might be called a confessional evangelical, but perhaps ordained in one of the "social gospel" denominations that supports all of the Left-leaning positions taken by the Democratic Party. However, we cannot say definitively due to her muzzy website and non-responses to a number of questionnaires. 

Voters may buy a pig in a poke on this race, due to sensationalism. But we believe that tack, as always, would be a mistake.

DISTRICTS DEMOCRATS TALK ABOUT, BUT WE DON'T BUY

Some Democrats have claimed that Tim Lewis in HD 60 is vulnerable. We don't give it a second thought, and haven't even covered it. Likewise, Democrats are always trying to knock off Diné Republican Sharon Clahchischilliage, claiming they can beat her every year. We have never believed them—even when she was running as the challenger. We don't believe them again this year. 

DISTRICTS THAT HAVE MIGRATED PERMANENTLY

Just like all of Los Alamos County, House District 43, especially after the growth in the Santa Fe County portion of the district, is no longer competitive. 


Email us (at nmpj@dfn.com) with your feedback, comments, questions and ideas.


Intelligent Political Discourse—for the Thoughtful New Mexican

 

back to list
National Issues

National Issues

Democrats

2016 Presidential Campaign - Democrats

Republicans

2016 Presidential Campaign - Republicans

Jeb Bush gets religion.

"They said he got religion at the end, and I'm glad that he did."  — Tom T. Hall. The Year Clayton Delaney died.

Well, it's official.  Jeb Bush has changed quite of few of his positions on illegal immigration.  The single most significant is that he no longer endorses the "path to citizenship" for those who came here illegally. 

This is, after all, the key portion of any proposal aimed at "reforming" our existing illegal immigration situation.

No sensible citizen can see any point in trying to deport between 12 and 16 million people currently living in America illegally.  And no candidate for any office that we know of supports that.  What the average American wants is for the country to "get a handle on it."  They want it stopped, our borders secured and future illegal immigration prevented.  It is a national security issue.

The Path to Legal Status

The only way to accomplish the above goals, is to identify current illegal immigrants, get them accounted for, have them documented, and placed on a path to legal status.  Neither they nor their children or spouses should live in a state of fear or anxiety.

But a path to "citizenship" is not the right course.  It is not morally or legally correct.  A merciful and compassionate nation can provide the safeguards of legal status without sending the message to the rest of the world that all you have to do is cross our border and you will eventually get to become a citizen, thus circumventing the legal framework scores of millions of Americans have followed, honored and respected.

If someone who is granted legal status eventually wants to become a citizen, that person should have to return to his or her country of origin and wait in line like 20 million people around the world are doing at any given time.  Failing that, America will forever send the signal that anyone in the world can "jump the line," and that there is no reason at all to obey our immigration and naturalization laws.

We Like Jeb Bush

We are glad Jeb Bush has learned this lesson.  He is a fine speaker, and can eloquently explain his positions on complex issue.  If he were not named "Bush" he would be an actual top tier candidate—in all that that title would entail, including likelihood of acceptance and support of and from the American people in the primaries, and in any theoretical general election.  

We also recognize that he already is a de facto top-tier candidate because of his fame and his fundraising.

If he were to be the nominee of the Republican Party we would heartily support him and endorse him.  We hope, however, that he is not, as he does not give the center-right coalition the best chance of winning.

Media Watch

Media Watch

County Government News

County Government News

Cities, Towns and Villages

Cities, Towns and Villages

Judicial Watch

Judicial Watch

Movies, Television, Pop Culture

Movies, Television, Pop Culture

  • Movies, Television, Pop Culture
    Selma   ????? We have now seen the Oscar-nominated movie Selma.   Our earlier allusion to criticism that sounded as though it was in an Oliver Stone category for historical fabrication is some...

Sports

Sports

The Major League Baseball Playoffs are not realistic, and destroy the actual meaning of the sport. 

Major League Baseball is unique in this respect—its postseason is markedly different from the way the game is played normally.  No other major league sport suffers from this flaw.

Not that much is wrong with baseball. In some respects it's the most well thought-out sport there is.  The "perfect game" many aficionados say.

But the Major League Baseball postseason experience is unique in the world of professional sports, and not in a good way. 

In fact the playoffs are flawed in such a way as to detract from the sport itself and diminish the game and what it means to be the world champion of the sport. 

Among the Big Four team sports of North America: football, hockey, basketball and baseball—and all the 122 professional major league teams competing in the NFL, NHL, NBA and MLB respectively—it is in baseball alone that the postseason turns the sport itself on its head and makes it reflect something that it is not.  This article will explain why that happens and why it is wrong-headed.

 

Background on the The Frequency of Play

The 30 teams in both the National Hockey League and the National Basketball Association teams play a very similar schedule.  On average, each team has a day off between games, sometimes two days off.  Though there are back-to-back games, they are relatively infrequent.  NBA teams play between 14 and 22 back-to-back games a season, and for the NHL it usually ranges between 9 and 19. The NFL has a full week between games, the exception being the new Thursday games that each team plays once, leaving them only four days' rest once a year.

But baseball players play every single day.  Ten days straight, then a day off, then seven more games, then a day off, then ten more games.  Typically a baseball team plays 27 games every 30 days.  For the NHL and NBA it would be 14 per month, and for the NFL the number would be 4.

 

Getting to the Playoffs:  It's a grind

In all four sports, getting to the postseason requires a total team effort—in fact an all-out total organizational effort.  Teams must be deep, have bench strength and the capability of moving players in and out of the lineup, and on and off the roster, who can take the place of key players who go down for an injury, or who have to miss games for whatever reason.  While this is true of the other three major sports as well, it is most certainly even more of a concern for baseball teams because of the sheer volume of games in which a team must field a competitive lineup.

Each league's regular season* is a marathon, not a sprint.  NFL teams play for 17 weeks, 16 games.  The NHL has an 82-game season over six months, paralleled by an NBA season of 84 games over the same timeframe. Baseball is the biggest marathon of all—a true test of resilience and endurance—162 games usually starting around the beginning of April and finishing about the end of September.

NHL teams carry 23-man rosters, of which 20 can be active for any particular game.  The NBA is similar, with 15-man rosters of which 13 can be on the bench for a given game. In the NFL, the teams have 53 players on a roster, but only 46 can suit up on game day.  In Major League Baseball, teams have a 25-man active roster, and all 25 are at the park every day.

 

The Postseason Playoffs:  Sport by Sport

The National Football League:

Of the 32 teams, 12 qualify for the playoffs.  The playoffs are conducted in the exact same manner as the regular season.  Each team plays once a week, the exception being that the four top teams get the first week off.  For a typical qualifier to reach the Super Bowl, the team must play three consecutive weeks.  At that point both remaining teams have two weeks off before the Super Bowl.

In short, the playoffs, with a game each week, reflects the same means of advancement as is present in regular season grind.

The National Hockey League: 

16 of the 30 teams qualify for the postseason.  The playoffs are conducted in the exact same manner as the regular season: a game, a day off, a game, a day off, a game, a day off, and so on.  Just as in the regular season, there are occasionally two days off.  But the playoffs require the same stamina, the same approach as that required to make the playoffs.

 

The National Basketball Association

16 of the 30 teams qualify for the postseason.  The playoffs are conducted in the exact same manner as the regular season: a game, a day off, a game, a day off, a game, a day off, and so on.  Just as in the regular season, there are occasionally two days off.  But the playoffs require the same stamina, the same approach as that required to make the playoffs.

Major League Baseball

10 of the 30 teams qualify for the postseason.  (Although four of those teams qualify only for a one-game do-or-die play-in game.)

Here is where all similarity to baseball ends. 

Unlike the other three sports whose playoffs mirror the test of the regular season, and whose conditions are the same as the regular season, Major League Baseball playoffs in no way resemble the sport itself.  In hockey, basketball and football, the teams win playoff games and reach the pinacle of the sport in exactly the same way that they qualify to try to do so. 

Not so in baseball.  They are two entirely different concepts.  Teams make the playoffs only because they have depth, five-man pitching rotations and can play day-in and day-out at a high level.  But the baseball playoffs suddenly become a kind of "all-star" game within each team's roster.  MLB playoffs are conducted in a way that more closely follows the NBA and the NHL.  Teams have enormous numbers of days off. 

Here's the key point:  No Major League Baseball team could even qualify for the postseason if they played the same way during the regular season that they do in the playoffs.  None.

In the regular season Major League Baseball teams have to use a 5-man starting rotation, with pitchers pitching every 5th day.  There are not enough days off to have even a four-man rotation, let alone a team with three pitchers.  Even the best team in baseball using only a 4-man rotation, would wear them out, and most likely end up with a record of something like 66-96, or 70-92—and that would be if they were otherwise teh best team in the sport.

 

The 2014 Baseball Postseason is Typical

As examples, last year's World Series teams the Kansas City Royals played only 15 games in 30 days, and the San Francisco Giants played only 17 games in 30 days.  The 12 to 15 days off in the non-baseball fantasy world of the MLB postseason, means that teams can turn to three pitchers and give all of them plenty of rest.  But it isn't the way baseball really works.

At one point, the Royals had 5 consecutive days off, and the Giants had 4.  This never happens in the regular season.  Even the All-Star break is only three days.  Very rarely is there anything beyond a one-day break, and even that happens only a couple of times a month. 

What this means is that neither team used the team that got them to the playoffs.  (The NFL, NBA and NHL teams ALL used the very same teams that got them to the playoffs.) 

Baseball teams use a three-man pitching rotation in the playoffs.  Sometimes, they essentially opt for two pitchers only—conceding the likelihood that some of their games are going to be lost—when their third-, or rarely fourth-best pitcher has to face one of their opponents' two-man or three-man rotation members. 

Imagine an NFL team using only one running back and three wide receivers, instead of rotating through their roster in the course of a playoff game—or using only 4 defensive backs and 4 linebackers, instead of rotating 8 or 9 DBs and 6 or 7 linebackers?  In hockey, would a team use only two or three of their forward lines?  Would an NBA team use only the starting five?  They would never make the post season if they tried to present that product to their fans during the regular season.

Those are the equivalents of what Major League Baseball sets up every fall.  No other sport drags its playoffs out in such a way as to completely change the playing field—completely change the dynamics of its game.

Why Does Baseball Do This?

MLB does this because the TV networks want to drag out the games so that they can try to have one game each day  This requires an unnecessary staggering of games, and creates the phenomenon of 15 off-days in a month.

What about travel days?

What about them?  Baseball has travel days constantly.  A team may play in Chicago one day and in Miami the next, or in New York one day and Phoenix the very next day.  Travel days as a routine part of the game are again, a phenomenon of television, and stretching out the playoffs.

In years past, travel days were employed only when necessary. The famous "subway series" games were played on seven consecutive days.  Why?  Because there was no "travel day" required to go from Brooklyn to the Bronx.  Today, they would put in artificial travel days.

Even fairly long train trips didn't necessarily matter.  The 1948 World Series between the Cleveland Indians and the Boston Braves was played in six consecutive days, October 6 & 7 in Boston, October 8, 9 & 10 in Cleveland, and October 11 back in Boston.

This reflects actual baseball, the way the teams play day-in and day-out, and the kind of unique test that baseball presents to its athletes, its managers and management, and to its fans.

In the modern world of charter planes, teams fly from coast to coast to play games on consecutive days.  The artificial "travel day" should be eliminated so that teams can play in the playoffs in the same way that got them there in the first place.


*All these leagues also have pre-seasons and training camps, which add an additional 6-8 weeks to each player's year.


Email us with your feedback, comments, questions and ideas. 

Religious Issues

Religious Issues

  • Religious Issues
    Coming Soon

Copyright New Mexico Political Journal 2015
EMAIL US WITH YOUR FEEDBACK, COMMENTS, QUESTIONS AND IDEAS

.

Loading...