New Mexico Political Journal
mobile icon
New Mexico Political Journal

.

Show Subnavigation
  • Home
  • About NMPJ
    • About
    • Editor
  • Feedback
  • Advertise on NMPJ

FacebookTwitter

If you read New Mexico Political Journal from a Facebook link, and appreciate the coverage of events, please “like” NMPJ on Facebook.

READERS WEIGH IN on the POST MORTEM: ASSESSING THE ASSESSMENT of the CATASTROPHE. READERS SHARE THEIR OPINIONS—WHICH WE HAVE INVITED ALL TO SHARE.

11/14/2018

We have thus far received over 220 comments on our issue dealing with the Post Mortem and those who Destroyed the Republican Party.

BELOW is a SAMPLING of the RESPONSES WE HAVE RECEIVED—TOGETHER WITH OUR COMMENTS

Paul Gonzales: No leadership!

Marie Ryan: Read & share. This article explains a lot! 

Linda Aaron: Every 'conservative' NM voter who is concerned about politics in this State should consider reading this post.

Gail Tansey: 'The dirty half dozen' -sad but true behind the Republican party's demise. They bit off the hand that fed them! Now we are doomed to be even worse than californication because unlike them we have always been poor as a state. Without the brain doesnt work people -we will see this play  out...

Laurel Tisler: I read the article and was taken by surprise. We seem to like destroying our selves. Every party has morons. New Mexico Republicans need to find better leadership! Our morons have out done themselves! 

Kevin Massey: How a handful of corrupt, self-serving political hacks could wield so much influence is sickening. 'Power corrupts - absolute power corrupts absolutely'. While they've handed total control over to the dems, sadly there will be little or no repercussions for them or the liberal left regarding New Mexico's dismal future. Our totally blue state will remain last in economics and education...and with the volatile, cyclical nature of the oil and gas industry, our budget surpluses will be quickly spent, leaving dire shortfalls in the next downturn. I love my state, but am disgusted by the sick, selfish, petty politics we must endure. The leadership of the Republican party is a big part of the problem.

Gail D. Goodman: Based on the election results, because I know for a fact we had some great candidates, the leadership isn't doing much.....
 
Greg Carlisle: Very good article, explains a lot of what happened. The same thing is going on nationally, disgruntled swamp rats siding with the opposition because their candidate lost, instead of moving a positive agenda forward. In the end, Yates will feel it in his wallet with the upcoming administration.
Manage
 
 
LETTERS

To NMPJ: Good analysis of Republican condition. Extremely disappointing. I do hope you are wrong that we are lost into the 2030s. Dems will screw up enough so that we can come back. Martinez won by about 40,000 which tells me NM voters are capable of switching. Forty thousand margin is unheard of for a Republican.  NMPJ Comment: We hope we are wrong about the 2030s too, though we outline why we believe that is the case. And yes, Martinez won by big margins—which makes you wonder why these haters decided to turn on her.

You are right about left wing bloggers, Monahan, getting stuff from R discontents. NMPJ Comment: Very perceptive. One of the dumbest things Republicans do is to try to curry favor/suck up to folks like Monahan. The Democrats are much smarter in that regard. They would never do the equivalent. 

Gerry Maestas

BARBARA SEEGER

To NMPJ:  Please contact me personally as I am a big Martinez supporter and we need a Republican Party overhaul immediately in time for the December 8 party vote. NMPJ Comment: Will do.

Barbara 

KEITH DOTSON

To NMPJ: Your analysis of the 2018 Republican disaster and what lead up to it is extremely interesting. I would be interested to know who the major contributors were to this analysis. NMPJ Comment: Our staff drew on a number of sources, but mainly the considerable archives of electoral data, campaign records, and the commentary by the naysayers and the records of their internally destructive tactics.

I did seem to me, patently obvious, that the Pearce campaign was not, in any way, trying to leverage any of the successes of the Martinez administration. NMPJ Comment: Your observation is accurate. Pearce even attacked, either by directly, or by inference, a number of Martinez reform efforts.? Can you help me understand more about why the people you identified as the Martinez haters became so selfishly engrossed in destroying the Republican Party. NMPJ Comment: We wish we could. Some of them have a record that is based purely on division, stretching back quite a number of years. Others wanted to be able to dictate policy and did not get to do so. Normal adult Republicans would not react by deciding to make the governor an "enemy." But we are at a loss to describe a rationale for much of it.

Thank you!  Keith Dotson

CYNTHIA BLACK

NMPJ Editor:

I’m responding to the article that trashes six people who have worked within the NM Republican Party...I'm a relative newcomer to NM Republican party, and in fact to the Republican Party at all.  I am a conservative who looked for and found a home in the Republican Party of Lincoln County.  For the past two years I’ve worked as 2nd Vice Chair with a primary responsibility for maximizing the vote in our county.  We had a record turnout, 15% higher than a typical midterm election. NMPJ Comment: Not true. The turnout in 2010 was one point higher  than 2018. 

Obviously, I’m very disappointed in the election results...when  I read this article, I felt physically ill.  The author does nothing to heal divides within our party, but rather relishes augmenting the wounds, and to what purpose?  ?NMPJ Comment: The writer has apparently not read the article (this letter appears dictated) otherwise she would have read that the wounds were inflicted over a period of years, with predictable results. We have simply pointed out the individuals who inflicted them, and [implicitly] recommend to Republicans not to follow them in future. When leadership is lacking, expect the vacuum to be filled, and not always to your liking. NMPJ Comment: Again, the writer appears not to have read the article, but merely to have signed on behalf of another author. Otherwise she would know that the party had great leadership, with excellent results—capturing the House and winning 4 of 8 statewide elections. That was not in any sense of the word a "vacuum." Those identified in the article worked to undermine the leadership that achieved those results, then they had nothing on their own to provide in its place. They became, in effect, "the vacuum" the writer describes.

I’m perfectly willing to give credit to Governor Martinez for her accomplishments, especially blocking many bad bills coming out of the Democrat-controlled legislature and the severely gerrymandered map that came from the Democrat leadership.  I applaud her for doing so.  Yet I would’ve hoped she could’ve provided proactive leadership on issues so needed in our state especially with regard the economy and education.  She had eight years to do something, yet her tenure has largely been marked by personalizing politics, attacking potential allies on both sides of the aisle, and being unwilling to learn in areas where she had no experience.  There’s a reason why her popularity plummeted this past few years. NMPJ Comment: The writer is repeating the attacks (not surprising in a dictated letter) of those who caused the Party's destruction. Being "perfectly willing" to give credit to Governor Martinez is a pretty empty statement when one 1) just won't actually do so, or 2) is ignorant of what has transpired.

-----Governor Martinez not only proposed huge numbers of educational reforms—battling public employee unions for 8 years. The high school graduation rate has increased to an all-time high. More students than ever have reached "proficiency" in reading and math. Graduation rates for Hispanic and low-income students are growing fastest of all.

----She also sought to diversify the economy she inherited (one very dependent on government—the same kind of economy all governors have inherited). She cut taxes 61 times—something the writer is unaware of because the letter's dictator has always focused on tearing down the governor rather than promoting her accomplishments. Our unemployment rate has fallen 42%, from 7.8% to 4.6%, and our economy has added 60,000 private sector jobs. Companies like Facebook, Safelite, Union Pacific, and Netflix have responded. 

----The Cato Institute just named her the best fiscal governor in the country, one reason being that she even though she inherited a state-record deficit, she leaves office with a $2 billion surplus.

Why has the state party not promoted these accomplishments? Show us where the state party has done anything to promote these positive accomplishments. 

"Likewise, I have nothing against Monty Newman, in fact he seems nice enough on a personal level.  During the primary, we invited all the CD2 candidates to debate the issues and answer questions from county Republicans.  Mr. Newman simply didn’t come off well, particularly when he refused to say how he’d align in the US House..." NMPJ Comment: We are not sure what this means—surely he didn't say he would "align" with the Democrats, as the individuals we have called out have done so many times "then bragged that he had the big money (Jay McCluskey, Gov. Martinez) behind him and that’s all that was needed to win in the general election."  NMPJ Comment: He actually said that? (That sounds exactly like something John Billingsley repeated several times to our readers.) We somehow doubt he said that.  Furthermore, it is hardly a positive attitude. (Again, we suspect the signer unwittingly translated the vitriolic attitude of Mr. Billingsley without stopping to consider how they did not exactly fit with her ostensible appeal to a "positive vision."

"... I do know John Billingsley.  Without a doubt John has strong opinions, and it’s based on his vast experience and long track record of tireless work as party chair, fundraiser, and a host of other chores."  NMPJ Comment: Fundraising? Billingsley raised almost no money as state party chair, and left the party in dire straits. And Billingsley went on record attacking the governor for her victories—gratuitous attacks. 

"...Perhaps the NM Republican Party needs burning down so we can build anew.  When we do, I sincerely hope we have a new team of fresh, energetic patriots with a positive vision for the future rather than party hacks with a long list of grievances from the past..." NMPJ Comment: We actually do agree with this. The people ("hacks" in Ms. Black's words) who nursed groundless grudges and drove Governor Martinez from her party leadership role—after she had led New Mexico Republicans to a 60-year electoral high—do in fact need to go the way of the buffalo. And if Ms. Black really read their history and concluded that they "done good," then she needs to go too.  

Respectfully submitted,

Cynthia Black, 2nd Vice Chair, RPLC, Secretary, FRWLC, Constitutional Conservatives of Lincoln County, principal

NMPJ Comment: Not a single word of Ms. Black's letter refutes, or even attempts to refute a single point we made in our article she is responding to. Instead she just kind of drifts in and out of ad hominem attacks—pretty much in the same style as Billingsley and others in the column we posted last week.

WE WERE SENT THESE COMMENTS BY A "Bob Cornelius"

"Those blogs are a bunch of revisionist history and CYA. Can’t believe such a one sided story. Plenty of blame to go around for losses in NM." NMPJ Comment: We would be glad to know any part of our story which is revisionist, or which can be shown to be false, in any respect. 


 

Email us (at nmpj@dfn.com) with your feedback, comments, questions and ideas.


Intelligent Political Discourse—for the Thoughtful New Mexican

 

 

back to list
National Issues

National Issues

Democrats

2016 Presidential Campaign - Democrats

Republicans

2016 Presidential Campaign - Republicans

Jeb Bush gets religion.

"They said he got religion at the end, and I'm glad that he did."  — Tom T. Hall. The Year Clayton Delaney died.

Well, it's official.  Jeb Bush has changed quite of few of his positions on illegal immigration.  The single most significant is that he no longer endorses the "path to citizenship" for those who came here illegally. 

This is, after all, the key portion of any proposal aimed at "reforming" our existing illegal immigration situation.

No sensible citizen can see any point in trying to deport between 12 and 16 million people currently living in America illegally.  And no candidate for any office that we know of supports that.  What the average American wants is for the country to "get a handle on it."  They want it stopped, our borders secured and future illegal immigration prevented.  It is a national security issue.

The Path to Legal Status

The only way to accomplish the above goals, is to identify current illegal immigrants, get them accounted for, have them documented, and placed on a path to legal status.  Neither they nor their children or spouses should live in a state of fear or anxiety.

But a path to "citizenship" is not the right course.  It is not morally or legally correct.  A merciful and compassionate nation can provide the safeguards of legal status without sending the message to the rest of the world that all you have to do is cross our border and you will eventually get to become a citizen, thus circumventing the legal framework scores of millions of Americans have followed, honored and respected.

If someone who is granted legal status eventually wants to become a citizen, that person should have to return to his or her country of origin and wait in line like 20 million people around the world are doing at any given time.  Failing that, America will forever send the signal that anyone in the world can "jump the line," and that there is no reason at all to obey our immigration and naturalization laws.

We Like Jeb Bush

We are glad Jeb Bush has learned this lesson.  He is a fine speaker, and can eloquently explain his positions on complex issue.  If he were not named "Bush" he would be an actual top tier candidate—in all that that title would entail, including likelihood of acceptance and support of and from the American people in the primaries, and in any theoretical general election.  

We also recognize that he already is a de facto top-tier candidate because of his fame and his fundraising.

If he were to be the nominee of the Republican Party we would heartily support him and endorse him.  We hope, however, that he is not, as he does not give the center-right coalition the best chance of winning.

Media Watch

Media Watch

County Government News

County Government News

Cities, Towns and Villages

Cities, Towns and Villages

Judicial Watch

Judicial Watch

Movies, Television, Pop Culture

Movies, Television, Pop Culture

  • Movies, Television, Pop Culture
    Selma   ????? We have now seen the Oscar-nominated movie Selma.   Our earlier allusion to criticism that sounded as though it was in an Oliver Stone category for historical fabrication is some...

Sports

Sports

The Major League Baseball Playoffs are not realistic, and destroy the actual meaning of the sport. 

Major League Baseball is unique in this respect—its postseason is markedly different from the way the game is played normally.  No other major league sport suffers from this flaw.

Not that much is wrong with baseball. In some respects it's the most well thought-out sport there is.  The "perfect game" many aficionados say.

But the Major League Baseball postseason experience is unique in the world of professional sports, and not in a good way. 

In fact the playoffs are flawed in such a way as to detract from the sport itself and diminish the game and what it means to be the world champion of the sport. 

Among the Big Four team sports of North America: football, hockey, basketball and baseball—and all the 122 professional major league teams competing in the NFL, NHL, NBA and MLB respectively—it is in baseball alone that the postseason turns the sport itself on its head and makes it reflect something that it is not.  This article will explain why that happens and why it is wrong-headed.

 

Background on the The Frequency of Play

The 30 teams in both the National Hockey League and the National Basketball Association teams play a very similar schedule.  On average, each team has a day off between games, sometimes two days off.  Though there are back-to-back games, they are relatively infrequent.  NBA teams play between 14 and 22 back-to-back games a season, and for the NHL it usually ranges between 9 and 19. The NFL has a full week between games, the exception being the new Thursday games that each team plays once, leaving them only four days' rest once a year.

But baseball players play every single day.  Ten days straight, then a day off, then seven more games, then a day off, then ten more games.  Typically a baseball team plays 27 games every 30 days.  For the NHL and NBA it would be 14 per month, and for the NFL the number would be 4.

 

Getting to the Playoffs:  It's a grind

In all four sports, getting to the postseason requires a total team effort—in fact an all-out total organizational effort.  Teams must be deep, have bench strength and the capability of moving players in and out of the lineup, and on and off the roster, who can take the place of key players who go down for an injury, or who have to miss games for whatever reason.  While this is true of the other three major sports as well, it is most certainly even more of a concern for baseball teams because of the sheer volume of games in which a team must field a competitive lineup.

Each league's regular season* is a marathon, not a sprint.  NFL teams play for 17 weeks, 16 games.  The NHL has an 82-game season over six months, paralleled by an NBA season of 84 games over the same timeframe. Baseball is the biggest marathon of all—a true test of resilience and endurance—162 games usually starting around the beginning of April and finishing about the end of September.

NHL teams carry 23-man rosters, of which 20 can be active for any particular game.  The NBA is similar, with 15-man rosters of which 13 can be on the bench for a given game. In the NFL, the teams have 53 players on a roster, but only 46 can suit up on game day.  In Major League Baseball, teams have a 25-man active roster, and all 25 are at the park every day.

 

The Postseason Playoffs:  Sport by Sport

The National Football League:

Of the 32 teams, 12 qualify for the playoffs.  The playoffs are conducted in the exact same manner as the regular season.  Each team plays once a week, the exception being that the four top teams get the first week off.  For a typical qualifier to reach the Super Bowl, the team must play three consecutive weeks.  At that point both remaining teams have two weeks off before the Super Bowl.

In short, the playoffs, with a game each week, reflects the same means of advancement as is present in regular season grind.

The National Hockey League: 

16 of the 30 teams qualify for the postseason.  The playoffs are conducted in the exact same manner as the regular season: a game, a day off, a game, a day off, a game, a day off, and so on.  Just as in the regular season, there are occasionally two days off.  But the playoffs require the same stamina, the same approach as that required to make the playoffs.

 

The National Basketball Association

16 of the 30 teams qualify for the postseason.  The playoffs are conducted in the exact same manner as the regular season: a game, a day off, a game, a day off, a game, a day off, and so on.  Just as in the regular season, there are occasionally two days off.  But the playoffs require the same stamina, the same approach as that required to make the playoffs.

Major League Baseball

10 of the 30 teams qualify for the postseason.  (Although four of those teams qualify only for a one-game do-or-die play-in game.)

Here is where all similarity to baseball ends. 

Unlike the other three sports whose playoffs mirror the test of the regular season, and whose conditions are the same as the regular season, Major League Baseball playoffs in no way resemble the sport itself.  In hockey, basketball and football, the teams win playoff games and reach the pinacle of the sport in exactly the same way that they qualify to try to do so. 

Not so in baseball.  They are two entirely different concepts.  Teams make the playoffs only because they have depth, five-man pitching rotations and can play day-in and day-out at a high level.  But the baseball playoffs suddenly become a kind of "all-star" game within each team's roster.  MLB playoffs are conducted in a way that more closely follows the NBA and the NHL.  Teams have enormous numbers of days off. 

Here's the key point:  No Major League Baseball team could even qualify for the postseason if they played the same way during the regular season that they do in the playoffs.  None.

In the regular season Major League Baseball teams have to use a 5-man starting rotation, with pitchers pitching every 5th day.  There are not enough days off to have even a four-man rotation, let alone a team with three pitchers.  Even the best team in baseball using only a 4-man rotation, would wear them out, and most likely end up with a record of something like 66-96, or 70-92—and that would be if they were otherwise teh best team in the sport.

 

The 2014 Baseball Postseason is Typical

As examples, last year's World Series teams the Kansas City Royals played only 15 games in 30 days, and the San Francisco Giants played only 17 games in 30 days.  The 12 to 15 days off in the non-baseball fantasy world of the MLB postseason, means that teams can turn to three pitchers and give all of them plenty of rest.  But it isn't the way baseball really works.

At one point, the Royals had 5 consecutive days off, and the Giants had 4.  This never happens in the regular season.  Even the All-Star break is only three days.  Very rarely is there anything beyond a one-day break, and even that happens only a couple of times a month. 

What this means is that neither team used the team that got them to the playoffs.  (The NFL, NBA and NHL teams ALL used the very same teams that got them to the playoffs.) 

Baseball teams use a three-man pitching rotation in the playoffs.  Sometimes, they essentially opt for two pitchers only—conceding the likelihood that some of their games are going to be lost—when their third-, or rarely fourth-best pitcher has to face one of their opponents' two-man or three-man rotation members. 

Imagine an NFL team using only one running back and three wide receivers, instead of rotating through their roster in the course of a playoff game—or using only 4 defensive backs and 4 linebackers, instead of rotating 8 or 9 DBs and 6 or 7 linebackers?  In hockey, would a team use only two or three of their forward lines?  Would an NBA team use only the starting five?  They would never make the post season if they tried to present that product to their fans during the regular season.

Those are the equivalents of what Major League Baseball sets up every fall.  No other sport drags its playoffs out in such a way as to completely change the playing field—completely change the dynamics of its game.

Why Does Baseball Do This?

MLB does this because the TV networks want to drag out the games so that they can try to have one game each day  This requires an unnecessary staggering of games, and creates the phenomenon of 15 off-days in a month.

What about travel days?

What about them?  Baseball has travel days constantly.  A team may play in Chicago one day and in Miami the next, or in New York one day and Phoenix the very next day.  Travel days as a routine part of the game are again, a phenomenon of television, and stretching out the playoffs.

In years past, travel days were employed only when necessary. The famous "subway series" games were played on seven consecutive days.  Why?  Because there was no "travel day" required to go from Brooklyn to the Bronx.  Today, they would put in artificial travel days.

Even fairly long train trips didn't necessarily matter.  The 1948 World Series between the Cleveland Indians and the Boston Braves was played in six consecutive days, October 6 & 7 in Boston, October 8, 9 & 10 in Cleveland, and October 11 back in Boston.

This reflects actual baseball, the way the teams play day-in and day-out, and the kind of unique test that baseball presents to its athletes, its managers and management, and to its fans.

In the modern world of charter planes, teams fly from coast to coast to play games on consecutive days.  The artificial "travel day" should be eliminated so that teams can play in the playoffs in the same way that got them there in the first place.


*All these leagues also have pre-seasons and training camps, which add an additional 6-8 weeks to each player's year.


Email us with your feedback, comments, questions and ideas. 

Religious Issues

Religious Issues

  • Religious Issues
    Coming Soon

Copyright New Mexico Political Journal 2015
EMAIL US WITH YOUR FEEDBACK, COMMENTS, QUESTIONS AND IDEAS

.

Loading...