New Mexico Political Journal
mobile icon
New Mexico Political Journal

.

Show Subnavigation
  • Home
  • About NMPJ
    • About
    • Editor
  • Feedback
  • Advertise on NMPJ

FacebookTwitter

If you read New Mexico Political Journal from a Facebook link, and appreciate the coverage of events, please “like” NMPJ on Facebook.

Democrats Hilarious on Korea: Suddenly, they are HUGE on Military Excercises—They Never Gave a Rat's Ass Before. Here is Their History on National Defense.

06/13/2018

It is hilarious to see the sudden reversals on the subject of North Korea by the Democrats and their fellow travelers in the media. Sometimes they go back and forth, reversing their positions every few hours depending on the latest news from Pyongyang, Singapore, or Washington, DC.

Suddenly the Democrats are HUGE supporters of military training exercises. NOTE: They have NEVER taken this position in the last 40 years. Until this week, they were like the Pete Seeger of military exercises—they considered them all “provocative.”

Now the Democrats are suddenly the second coming of John J. Pershing—they are “appalled” that we might not have a joint training exercise with the Republic of Korea.

They are hilarious.

SAME THING on NEGOTIATIONS with KIM JONG UN

• At first, the Democrats and the media were all over Trump, saying he had us on the verge of nuclear war: “He needs to try diplomacy.”

• So he tries diplomacy, and they say: “He’s talking to a tyrant. Trump is only elevating Kim Jong Un.”

• The media and Democrats go on and on: “Kim Jon Un is ‘winning,’ he’s taking Trump for a ride. Trump is getting nothing. Kim is getting everything.”

• Trump calls off the summit. The media and Democrats go wild: “He’s not trying diplomacy. He’s choosing a dangerous path. We are in great danger of war.”

• North Korea wants the summit back on. The media go wild: “Trump is giving away the farm. Kim is giving up nothing. Trump is losing.”

PLEASE UNDERSTAND THIS: With the American Media Trump is ALWAYS Losing

With the American media there is no way for Trump to do anything “correctly.” If they don’t like something he is doing, and he switches to their ostensible position, they will switch away from that position and he will still be “wrong.” Or they will say that the “old” position is now the “correct” one. Yes, they are that brazen.

Don’t get us wrong: Trump makes many mistakes and is terribly inarticulate. We admit that. But he is no LESS accurate than the American media. They empower him by means of their own ignorance and incompetence.

THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY’S HISTORY on NATIONAL DEFENSE

 1. The Democratic Party was strong on national defense, with a strong internationalist foreign policy stance some 80 years ago under FDR. During this era, their stance included an entirely understandable yet fairly brief pro-Russia period with our erstwhile allies (USSR) whilst World War II was our highest priority. Meanwhile, contemporaneously, the Republican Party was generally isolationist and anti-internationalist.

2. As the Russians ceased being our allies (1945–46) and became our greatest threat, it was Democrats (Harry S. Truman, Dean Acheson, George Kennan, et al.) who formulated and directed a very strong anti-USSR containment and Cold War policy. This was a bipartisan effort in that the Republicans had been converted to a more internationalist posture during the war and largely based on the reality they began to see in the closing months of the war.

3. This national policy of essentially fighting the Cold War together in a bipartisan way lasted some 30 years (+/-). But it began to disintegrate in the wake of Vietnam as Democrats began to split between what might be described as the Scoop Jackson and the George McGovern wings.

4. By the time of the 1984 Democratic National Convention in San Francisco, the bulk of the Democratic Party had abandoned the Cold War and had fully embraced what they termed "the Nuclear Freeze movement." Democrats, led by Senator Alan Cranston of California among many others, ridiculed then-President Ronald Reagan, saying the Cold War was "unwinnable," and urging an end to Reagan's defense build-up.

As a result, Reagan and the Republicans ended up winning the Cold War by themselves — much to the chagrin of the Democrats who suddenly wanted everyone to forget their Nuclear Freeze efforts.

5. The political and ideological imperatives caused by the Democrats’ traumatic experience with Vietnam has continued to the present day, with ever-increasing detachment from making a priority of the maintenance of a strong national security posture.

6. This reached perhaps its apex (or at least a pivotal moment) when in the 2012 foreign policy debate, President Barack Obama famously snorted at Romney’s assessment of Russia as a serious global threat.  Obama sneered condescendingly:

  “The 80s called and they want their foreign policy back.”

All subsequent actions by Obama, as well as prior ones by his administration, including by Hillary Clinton at the State Department, were consistent with the attitude expressed by Obama in his debate with Romney:  Russia was seen as no threat, and indeed as mere puppy dogs.

7. Nothing Russia did — whether in its efforts to intimidate the Baltic States, or Poland and the Czech Republic, its invasion of Ukraine, its invasion and occupation of Crimea, its intervention in Syria, or its overtures to Iran, or any other action — seemed to matter at all to Obama or to Democratic Party leadership. Russia's long history of computer hacking and attempts to interfere with information technology didn't matter to Obama. Communications intercepts were seen as routine, understandable, and of little importance not only to Obama, but to Democrats in Congress as well. Russian aggression, both in physical and military terms as well as in cyberspace, continued with near-demonic fervor throughout Obama’s 8 years — but nothing mattered to the Democrats. Everything was, in popular parlance, totally cool.

8. Then on November 8, 2016, Hillary Clinton lost the presidential election. At that point, Obama’s “legacy” became a subject of dispute and concern. The dominant narrative was that yes "Hillary had lost," but also "Obama had been rejected."  Suddenly EVERYTHING changed. Almost overnight, the Russians became the greatest threat in American history. Over a period of no more than 3 to 5 days, the narrative became: “Obama’s record was not rejected by the voters. No. The Russians stole the election.”

9. This theme was enthusiastically picked up by congressional Democrats and a nationwide array of political party operatives and elected officials that suddenly found themselves not only on the outs, but without identifiable leadership and, perhaps most alarming: without a message.  "The Russians" was a convenient, if not ready-made, message, and besides that it was the only message they had.

10. For students of George Orwell, the Democrats' sudden shift and near-total conversion and overnight change of attitude immediately brought to mind the Novel 1984, in which the government would tell the people that they were not switching sides or changing our message. No. "Oceania has ALWAYS been at war with East Asia."

Is the Democratic Party Really Russophobic?

Of course not. And history shows that for at least the past 35 years, the Democrats have not opposed the Russians or considered them to be a threat.

All that recent events show is that the Democratic Party leadership, when confronted with what they consider a "crisis" — not a true national crisis, mind you, but a crisis for their own party organization — can turn on a dime and change what they “believe” to be true.

But in the final analysis, this includes a sudden re-writing of history, and actually a re-writing of very recent, even current, events.

Are they truly Russophobic, meaning do they really and truly take Russia seriously? There is no evidence that they do. But they can use "Russia" as a rallying point for a political party in deep disarray. "Any port in a storm," as the saying goes.


COMING UP: MORE COUNTY RACES FROM AROUND THE STATE


Email us (at nmpj@dfn.com) with your feedback, comments, questions, and ideas.


Intelligent Political Discourse—for the Thoughtful New Mexican

back to list
National Issues

National Issues

Democrats

2016 Presidential Campaign - Democrats

Republicans

2016 Presidential Campaign - Republicans

Jeb Bush gets religion.

"They said he got religion at the end, and I'm glad that he did."  — Tom T. Hall. The Year Clayton Delaney died.

Well, it's official.  Jeb Bush has changed quite of few of his positions on illegal immigration.  The single most significant is that he no longer endorses the "path to citizenship" for those who came here illegally. 

This is, after all, the key portion of any proposal aimed at "reforming" our existing illegal immigration situation.

No sensible citizen can see any point in trying to deport between 12 and 16 million people currently living in America illegally.  And no candidate for any office that we know of supports that.  What the average American wants is for the country to "get a handle on it."  They want it stopped, our borders secured and future illegal immigration prevented.  It is a national security issue.

The Path to Legal Status

The only way to accomplish the above goals, is to identify current illegal immigrants, get them accounted for, have them documented, and placed on a path to legal status.  Neither they nor their children or spouses should live in a state of fear or anxiety.

But a path to "citizenship" is not the right course.  It is not morally or legally correct.  A merciful and compassionate nation can provide the safeguards of legal status without sending the message to the rest of the world that all you have to do is cross our border and you will eventually get to become a citizen, thus circumventing the legal framework scores of millions of Americans have followed, honored and respected.

If someone who is granted legal status eventually wants to become a citizen, that person should have to return to his or her country of origin and wait in line like 20 million people around the world are doing at any given time.  Failing that, America will forever send the signal that anyone in the world can "jump the line," and that there is no reason at all to obey our immigration and naturalization laws.

We Like Jeb Bush

We are glad Jeb Bush has learned this lesson.  He is a fine speaker, and can eloquently explain his positions on complex issue.  If he were not named "Bush" he would be an actual top tier candidate—in all that that title would entail, including likelihood of acceptance and support of and from the American people in the primaries, and in any theoretical general election.  

We also recognize that he already is a de facto top-tier candidate because of his fame and his fundraising.

If he were to be the nominee of the Republican Party we would heartily support him and endorse him.  We hope, however, that he is not, as he does not give the center-right coalition the best chance of winning.

Media Watch

Media Watch

County Government News

County Government News

Cities, Towns and Villages

Cities, Towns and Villages

Judicial Watch

Judicial Watch

Movies, Television, Pop Culture

Movies, Television, Pop Culture

  • Movies, Television, Pop Culture
    Selma   ????? We have now seen the Oscar-nominated movie Selma.   Our earlier allusion to criticism that sounded as though it was in an Oliver Stone category for historical fabrication is some...

Sports

Sports

The Major League Baseball Playoffs are not realistic, and destroy the actual meaning of the sport. 

Major League Baseball is unique in this respect—its postseason is markedly different from the way the game is played normally.  No other major league sport suffers from this flaw.

Not that much is wrong with baseball. In some respects it's the most well thought-out sport there is.  The "perfect game" many aficionados say.

But the Major League Baseball postseason experience is unique in the world of professional sports, and not in a good way. 

In fact the playoffs are flawed in such a way as to detract from the sport itself and diminish the game and what it means to be the world champion of the sport. 

Among the Big Four team sports of North America: football, hockey, basketball and baseball—and all the 122 professional major league teams competing in the NFL, NHL, NBA and MLB respectively—it is in baseball alone that the postseason turns the sport itself on its head and makes it reflect something that it is not.  This article will explain why that happens and why it is wrong-headed.

 

Background on the The Frequency of Play

The 30 teams in both the National Hockey League and the National Basketball Association teams play a very similar schedule.  On average, each team has a day off between games, sometimes two days off.  Though there are back-to-back games, they are relatively infrequent.  NBA teams play between 14 and 22 back-to-back games a season, and for the NHL it usually ranges between 9 and 19. The NFL has a full week between games, the exception being the new Thursday games that each team plays once, leaving them only four days' rest once a year.

But baseball players play every single day.  Ten days straight, then a day off, then seven more games, then a day off, then ten more games.  Typically a baseball team plays 27 games every 30 days.  For the NHL and NBA it would be 14 per month, and for the NFL the number would be 4.

 

Getting to the Playoffs:  It's a grind

In all four sports, getting to the postseason requires a total team effort—in fact an all-out total organizational effort.  Teams must be deep, have bench strength and the capability of moving players in and out of the lineup, and on and off the roster, who can take the place of key players who go down for an injury, or who have to miss games for whatever reason.  While this is true of the other three major sports as well, it is most certainly even more of a concern for baseball teams because of the sheer volume of games in which a team must field a competitive lineup.

Each league's regular season* is a marathon, not a sprint.  NFL teams play for 17 weeks, 16 games.  The NHL has an 82-game season over six months, paralleled by an NBA season of 84 games over the same timeframe. Baseball is the biggest marathon of all—a true test of resilience and endurance—162 games usually starting around the beginning of April and finishing about the end of September.

NHL teams carry 23-man rosters, of which 20 can be active for any particular game.  The NBA is similar, with 15-man rosters of which 13 can be on the bench for a given game. In the NFL, the teams have 53 players on a roster, but only 46 can suit up on game day.  In Major League Baseball, teams have a 25-man active roster, and all 25 are at the park every day.

 

The Postseason Playoffs:  Sport by Sport

The National Football League:

Of the 32 teams, 12 qualify for the playoffs.  The playoffs are conducted in the exact same manner as the regular season.  Each team plays once a week, the exception being that the four top teams get the first week off.  For a typical qualifier to reach the Super Bowl, the team must play three consecutive weeks.  At that point both remaining teams have two weeks off before the Super Bowl.

In short, the playoffs, with a game each week, reflects the same means of advancement as is present in regular season grind.

The National Hockey League: 

16 of the 30 teams qualify for the postseason.  The playoffs are conducted in the exact same manner as the regular season: a game, a day off, a game, a day off, a game, a day off, and so on.  Just as in the regular season, there are occasionally two days off.  But the playoffs require the same stamina, the same approach as that required to make the playoffs.

 

The National Basketball Association

16 of the 30 teams qualify for the postseason.  The playoffs are conducted in the exact same manner as the regular season: a game, a day off, a game, a day off, a game, a day off, and so on.  Just as in the regular season, there are occasionally two days off.  But the playoffs require the same stamina, the same approach as that required to make the playoffs.

Major League Baseball

10 of the 30 teams qualify for the postseason.  (Although four of those teams qualify only for a one-game do-or-die play-in game.)

Here is where all similarity to baseball ends. 

Unlike the other three sports whose playoffs mirror the test of the regular season, and whose conditions are the same as the regular season, Major League Baseball playoffs in no way resemble the sport itself.  In hockey, basketball and football, the teams win playoff games and reach the pinacle of the sport in exactly the same way that they qualify to try to do so. 

Not so in baseball.  They are two entirely different concepts.  Teams make the playoffs only because they have depth, five-man pitching rotations and can play day-in and day-out at a high level.  But the baseball playoffs suddenly become a kind of "all-star" game within each team's roster.  MLB playoffs are conducted in a way that more closely follows the NBA and the NHL.  Teams have enormous numbers of days off. 

Here's the key point:  No Major League Baseball team could even qualify for the postseason if they played the same way during the regular season that they do in the playoffs.  None.

In the regular season Major League Baseball teams have to use a 5-man starting rotation, with pitchers pitching every 5th day.  There are not enough days off to have even a four-man rotation, let alone a team with three pitchers.  Even the best team in baseball using only a 4-man rotation, would wear them out, and most likely end up with a record of something like 66-96, or 70-92—and that would be if they were otherwise teh best team in the sport.

 

The 2014 Baseball Postseason is Typical

As examples, last year's World Series teams the Kansas City Royals played only 15 games in 30 days, and the San Francisco Giants played only 17 games in 30 days.  The 12 to 15 days off in the non-baseball fantasy world of the MLB postseason, means that teams can turn to three pitchers and give all of them plenty of rest.  But it isn't the way baseball really works.

At one point, the Royals had 5 consecutive days off, and the Giants had 4.  This never happens in the regular season.  Even the All-Star break is only three days.  Very rarely is there anything beyond a one-day break, and even that happens only a couple of times a month. 

What this means is that neither team used the team that got them to the playoffs.  (The NFL, NBA and NHL teams ALL used the very same teams that got them to the playoffs.) 

Baseball teams use a three-man pitching rotation in the playoffs.  Sometimes, they essentially opt for two pitchers only—conceding the likelihood that some of their games are going to be lost—when their third-, or rarely fourth-best pitcher has to face one of their opponents' two-man or three-man rotation members. 

Imagine an NFL team using only one running back and three wide receivers, instead of rotating through their roster in the course of a playoff game—or using only 4 defensive backs and 4 linebackers, instead of rotating 8 or 9 DBs and 6 or 7 linebackers?  In hockey, would a team use only two or three of their forward lines?  Would an NBA team use only the starting five?  They would never make the post season if they tried to present that product to their fans during the regular season.

Those are the equivalents of what Major League Baseball sets up every fall.  No other sport drags its playoffs out in such a way as to completely change the playing field—completely change the dynamics of its game.

Why Does Baseball Do This?

MLB does this because the TV networks want to drag out the games so that they can try to have one game each day  This requires an unnecessary staggering of games, and creates the phenomenon of 15 off-days in a month.

What about travel days?

What about them?  Baseball has travel days constantly.  A team may play in Chicago one day and in Miami the next, or in New York one day and Phoenix the very next day.  Travel days as a routine part of the game are again, a phenomenon of television, and stretching out the playoffs.

In years past, travel days were employed only when necessary. The famous "subway series" games were played on seven consecutive days.  Why?  Because there was no "travel day" required to go from Brooklyn to the Bronx.  Today, they would put in artificial travel days.

Even fairly long train trips didn't necessarily matter.  The 1948 World Series between the Cleveland Indians and the Boston Braves was played in six consecutive days, October 6 & 7 in Boston, October 8, 9 & 10 in Cleveland, and October 11 back in Boston.

This reflects actual baseball, the way the teams play day-in and day-out, and the kind of unique test that baseball presents to its athletes, its managers and management, and to its fans.

In the modern world of charter planes, teams fly from coast to coast to play games on consecutive days.  The artificial "travel day" should be eliminated so that teams can play in the playoffs in the same way that got them there in the first place.


*All these leagues also have pre-seasons and training camps, which add an additional 6-8 weeks to each player's year.


Email us with your feedback, comments, questions and ideas. 

Religious Issues

Religious Issues

  • Religious Issues
    Coming Soon

Copyright New Mexico Political Journal 2015
EMAIL US WITH YOUR FEEDBACK, COMMENTS, QUESTIONS AND IDEAS

.

Loading...