New Mexico Political Journal
mobile icon
New Mexico Political Journal

.

Show Subnavigation
  • Home
  • About NMPJ
    • About
    • Editor
  • Feedback
  • Advertise on NMPJ

FacebookTwitter

If you read New Mexico Political Journal from a Facebook link, and appreciate the coverage of events, please “like” NMPJ on Facebook.

PART II: THE NEW MEXICO MEDIA DOUBLE STANDARD—ASTONISHING and BRAZEN. PART II of a TWO-PART SERIES. GRISHAM is the NEW MEXICO MEDIA DARLING—TREATED the EXACT OPPOSITE of MARTINEZ.

04/30/2019

42% APPROVAL for MARTINEZ = DEATH IMMINENT.

BUT 41% APPROVAL for GRISHAM = PRETTY DARNED GOOD

A Morning Consult poll last week found that Governor Grisham has only a 41% approval rating. For the following reasons, that's actually amazingly low. Here's why: 

Governor Michelle Grisham:

  • Just got elected by a landslide and is in the honeymoon period
  • Just 45 days ago got just about every single thing she wanted from a recent legislative session
  • Just about 15 days ago finished signing a slew of bills with maximum fawningly positive press coverage
  • Has received no scrutiny whatsoever from the media
  • Had a dark money group spend hundreds of thousands of dollars supporting her for 60 days during the legislative session

All of that should have her in the mid- to high-70s—at a bare minimum. But the reality is that Grisham did quite a few things that could easily explain why she’s 35 points below where she should be. Grisham also did the following:

  • Raised taxes as if we were in a world war and New Mexico had to pay for the entire thing
  • Raised taxes despite being left with an all-time record budget surplus
  • Attacked gun owner rights in a state where Hispanic Democrats and many independents believe in the 2nd Amendment
  • Went all-out for abortion of actual live babies—well beyond “pro-choice” abortion arguments
  • Gave away our electoral votes—allowing California to decide how New Mexicans vote

So, despite where she should be in approval ratings, she has a mere 41% approval rating. 

How did the New Mexico Press Handle Governor Grisham's 41% Approval Rating?

 

So how did the press handle Governor Grisham’s 41% approval rating? They defended and spun for her, of course. Apparently, when Grisham hired the Santa Fe New Mexican reporter who covered the election to be her communications director, she must have also got the rest of the paper as her surrogate spokesperson in sort of a package deal.

Now, we will openly concede that a single poll does not a trend make. Our interest is not in arguing the validity of the poll, but rather the disparity of the press coverage in how the press handled similar polls about Governor Martinez.

When Martinez had a 42% approval rating in 2017, during her second term, the media almost lost their minds in condemnation and attacks. The Santa Fe New Mexican wrote a story titled, “Martinez approval rating sinks in new poll.”

Heck, even when Martinez had a 55% approval rating in 2014, the headline of the Santa Fe New Mexican was:

“Poll: Gov. Martinez Approval Rating Dips"

and the lede was:

“A new poll published this week suggests Gov. Susana Martinez’s approval ratings are dropping.”

https://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/legislature/poll-gov-martinez-s-approval-ratings-dip/article_e4cffe68-8bb9-5aa3-9abb-3f81a8b26e4f.html

But back to the coverage of the recent Grisham poll...

The Santa Fe New Mexican editorial page editor took a break from her non-stop promotion of Democrat presidential candidates (we think she has a crush on Cory Booker, by the way) to tweet that the poll just reflects how Americans are skeptical of everything and everyone these days.  Nothing to see here:

Inez Russell Gomez @inezrussell Apr 25  ‏ 

    I think voters across the country are skeptical. Of everything.
 
Of course, that tweet in defense of Grisham is completely illogical. Grisham ranked 44th out of 50 governors—the 6th from the bottom—the 44th least popular governor in America. So, the idea that "oh well, it's just a national trend," is as absurd as it is biased. 

Another Santa Fe New Mexican correspondent, Steve Terrell, wrote a long column "splainin'" why the Grisham poll is, well, just plain meaningless, but how Martinez is, well, just plain terrible. This is the same Steve Terrell who covered Martinez’s 55% approval rating by saying it was a sign of weakness, and later pointing out that her 42% rating was a sign of political death!

The New Mexican Splainin'

In his "explanation" column, Terrell posited the notion that all governors get a honeymoon period and added the truly ridiculous throwaway line that he was (somehow) accused (by somebody) of being too soft on Martinez.

Right. During her first year, the New Mexican repeatedly accused her of corruption, and also attacked her continuously over the Downs at Albuquerque—for decisions over which there was not a shred of evidence to suggest any wrongdoing—and decisions by the way that completely revitalized Expo New Mexico.

Santa Fe New Mexican Accuses Martinez of Being a Virtual Illegal Immigrant

Most outrageously, the Santa Fe New Mexican actually concocted stories that Martinez's great grandfather was an illegal immigrant. We are not making this up. Their stupid story, in turn, created national stories and headlines. Their false story was later debunked when real reporters for real news outlets, and real editors, actually did the leg work to investigate—the kind of reporting requirements that never even occurred to the New Mexican. 

But why did the New Mexican do that in the first place? Because the paper itself has its own agenda, and near the top of the list was its support for driver's licenses for illegal immigrants. Susana was pushing to repeal that extremely stupid law, and it offended the New Mexican. Thus the motivation for making up their story. 

Scrutiny for Grisham?

Is there any scrutiny of anything supported by Grisham? No. Because the paper supports all of her agenda, no matter how hare-brained it may be.

Grisham says that there is no crisis at all at the border (something we heard verbatim when we interviewed a number of Democrat and independent lawyers recently—it's funny how people say the exact same things they hear on TV, but we digress).

Even Obama Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson says there is an enormous crisis at the border.

So Grisham pulls the National Guard from the border. But does any New Mexico media person ever approach Grisham and ask if she still stands by her position? Even after very far Left Democrats have done so? No. They don't.

The Double Standard in Many Reporters.

We Don't Want to pick on Steve Terrell—There are a Number of Others, but You Should Know some Things

As an aside, Steve Terrell, who wrote the "explanation" column, is the same reporter whose son was working for the Democrat candidate's campaign to defeat former Republican State Representative Conrad James…a campaign Terrell and the New Mexican were covering.

Terrell didn’t even disclose that obvious conflict until after the election—and AFTER all of the grossly negative stories about Republican Conrad James that the Santa Fe paper chose to write about an Albuquerque legislative race—stories and headlines that most conveniently showed up in Democrat attack mail against Conrad James. How did that happen?

We are sure the New Mexican would argue that it was "just a coincidence." No way a father was working to create attack mail for a son. Nope. Nothing to see here. (Also, did anyone wonder why there was little or zero coverage of any other Albuquerque races in the Santa Fe paper?  

(Here we go again with the New Mexican—it's no wonder why the New Mexican and the notorious Lefty/Bolshie "free" supermarket giveaway paper, the Santa Fe Reporter, are just farm teams for each others' "reporters." They both editorialize all of their stories, and there is zero separation between the editorial page and the "news" coverage. But we digress.) 

THE DOUBLE STANDARD

In any case, the existence of this double-standard is no surprise to us, and probably no surprise to most of our readers. We could write a column like this virtually every week. But what we still find stunning is how reporters and editors continue to claim that they are fair and unbiased.

The first step is admitting the problem. Until then, the press will continue to lose public trust and readership. And they will continue to have more polls come out that they’ll need to dismiss: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/trust-in-media-hits-bottom-60-percent-say-sources-pay-for-stories


Email us (at nmpj@dfn.com) with your feedback, comments, questions and ideas.


Intelligent Political Discourse—for the Thoughtful New Mexican

 

back to list
National Issues

National Issues

Democrats

2016 Presidential Campaign - Democrats

Republicans

2016 Presidential Campaign - Republicans

Jeb Bush gets religion.

"They said he got religion at the end, and I'm glad that he did."  — Tom T. Hall. The Year Clayton Delaney died.

Well, it's official.  Jeb Bush has changed quite of few of his positions on illegal immigration.  The single most significant is that he no longer endorses the "path to citizenship" for those who came here illegally. 

This is, after all, the key portion of any proposal aimed at "reforming" our existing illegal immigration situation.

No sensible citizen can see any point in trying to deport between 12 and 16 million people currently living in America illegally.  And no candidate for any office that we know of supports that.  What the average American wants is for the country to "get a handle on it."  They want it stopped, our borders secured and future illegal immigration prevented.  It is a national security issue.

The Path to Legal Status

The only way to accomplish the above goals, is to identify current illegal immigrants, get them accounted for, have them documented, and placed on a path to legal status.  Neither they nor their children or spouses should live in a state of fear or anxiety.

But a path to "citizenship" is not the right course.  It is not morally or legally correct.  A merciful and compassionate nation can provide the safeguards of legal status without sending the message to the rest of the world that all you have to do is cross our border and you will eventually get to become a citizen, thus circumventing the legal framework scores of millions of Americans have followed, honored and respected.

If someone who is granted legal status eventually wants to become a citizen, that person should have to return to his or her country of origin and wait in line like 20 million people around the world are doing at any given time.  Failing that, America will forever send the signal that anyone in the world can "jump the line," and that there is no reason at all to obey our immigration and naturalization laws.

We Like Jeb Bush

We are glad Jeb Bush has learned this lesson.  He is a fine speaker, and can eloquently explain his positions on complex issue.  If he were not named "Bush" he would be an actual top tier candidate—in all that that title would entail, including likelihood of acceptance and support of and from the American people in the primaries, and in any theoretical general election.  

We also recognize that he already is a de facto top-tier candidate because of his fame and his fundraising.

If he were to be the nominee of the Republican Party we would heartily support him and endorse him.  We hope, however, that he is not, as he does not give the center-right coalition the best chance of winning.

Media Watch

Media Watch

County Government News

County Government News

Cities, Towns and Villages

Cities, Towns and Villages

Judicial Watch

Judicial Watch

Movies, Television, Pop Culture

Movies, Television, Pop Culture

  • Movies, Television, Pop Culture
    Selma   ????? We have now seen the Oscar-nominated movie Selma.   Our earlier allusion to criticism that sounded as though it was in an Oliver Stone category for historical fabrication is some...

Sports

Sports

The Major League Baseball Playoffs are not realistic, and destroy the actual meaning of the sport. 

Major League Baseball is unique in this respect—its postseason is markedly different from the way the game is played normally.  No other major league sport suffers from this flaw.

Not that much is wrong with baseball. In some respects it's the most well thought-out sport there is.  The "perfect game" many aficionados say.

But the Major League Baseball postseason experience is unique in the world of professional sports, and not in a good way. 

In fact the playoffs are flawed in such a way as to detract from the sport itself and diminish the game and what it means to be the world champion of the sport. 

Among the Big Four team sports of North America: football, hockey, basketball and baseball—and all the 122 professional major league teams competing in the NFL, NHL, NBA and MLB respectively—it is in baseball alone that the postseason turns the sport itself on its head and makes it reflect something that it is not.  This article will explain why that happens and why it is wrong-headed.

 

Background on the The Frequency of Play

The 30 teams in both the National Hockey League and the National Basketball Association teams play a very similar schedule.  On average, each team has a day off between games, sometimes two days off.  Though there are back-to-back games, they are relatively infrequent.  NBA teams play between 14 and 22 back-to-back games a season, and for the NHL it usually ranges between 9 and 19. The NFL has a full week between games, the exception being the new Thursday games that each team plays once, leaving them only four days' rest once a year.

But baseball players play every single day.  Ten days straight, then a day off, then seven more games, then a day off, then ten more games.  Typically a baseball team plays 27 games every 30 days.  For the NHL and NBA it would be 14 per month, and for the NFL the number would be 4.

 

Getting to the Playoffs:  It's a grind

In all four sports, getting to the postseason requires a total team effort—in fact an all-out total organizational effort.  Teams must be deep, have bench strength and the capability of moving players in and out of the lineup, and on and off the roster, who can take the place of key players who go down for an injury, or who have to miss games for whatever reason.  While this is true of the other three major sports as well, it is most certainly even more of a concern for baseball teams because of the sheer volume of games in which a team must field a competitive lineup.

Each league's regular season* is a marathon, not a sprint.  NFL teams play for 17 weeks, 16 games.  The NHL has an 82-game season over six months, paralleled by an NBA season of 84 games over the same timeframe. Baseball is the biggest marathon of all—a true test of resilience and endurance—162 games usually starting around the beginning of April and finishing about the end of September.

NHL teams carry 23-man rosters, of which 20 can be active for any particular game.  The NBA is similar, with 15-man rosters of which 13 can be on the bench for a given game. In the NFL, the teams have 53 players on a roster, but only 46 can suit up on game day.  In Major League Baseball, teams have a 25-man active roster, and all 25 are at the park every day.

 

The Postseason Playoffs:  Sport by Sport

The National Football League:

Of the 32 teams, 12 qualify for the playoffs.  The playoffs are conducted in the exact same manner as the regular season.  Each team plays once a week, the exception being that the four top teams get the first week off.  For a typical qualifier to reach the Super Bowl, the team must play three consecutive weeks.  At that point both remaining teams have two weeks off before the Super Bowl.

In short, the playoffs, with a game each week, reflects the same means of advancement as is present in regular season grind.

The National Hockey League: 

16 of the 30 teams qualify for the postseason.  The playoffs are conducted in the exact same manner as the regular season: a game, a day off, a game, a day off, a game, a day off, and so on.  Just as in the regular season, there are occasionally two days off.  But the playoffs require the same stamina, the same approach as that required to make the playoffs.

 

The National Basketball Association

16 of the 30 teams qualify for the postseason.  The playoffs are conducted in the exact same manner as the regular season: a game, a day off, a game, a day off, a game, a day off, and so on.  Just as in the regular season, there are occasionally two days off.  But the playoffs require the same stamina, the same approach as that required to make the playoffs.

Major League Baseball

10 of the 30 teams qualify for the postseason.  (Although four of those teams qualify only for a one-game do-or-die play-in game.)

Here is where all similarity to baseball ends. 

Unlike the other three sports whose playoffs mirror the test of the regular season, and whose conditions are the same as the regular season, Major League Baseball playoffs in no way resemble the sport itself.  In hockey, basketball and football, the teams win playoff games and reach the pinacle of the sport in exactly the same way that they qualify to try to do so. 

Not so in baseball.  They are two entirely different concepts.  Teams make the playoffs only because they have depth, five-man pitching rotations and can play day-in and day-out at a high level.  But the baseball playoffs suddenly become a kind of "all-star" game within each team's roster.  MLB playoffs are conducted in a way that more closely follows the NBA and the NHL.  Teams have enormous numbers of days off. 

Here's the key point:  No Major League Baseball team could even qualify for the postseason if they played the same way during the regular season that they do in the playoffs.  None.

In the regular season Major League Baseball teams have to use a 5-man starting rotation, with pitchers pitching every 5th day.  There are not enough days off to have even a four-man rotation, let alone a team with three pitchers.  Even the best team in baseball using only a 4-man rotation, would wear them out, and most likely end up with a record of something like 66-96, or 70-92—and that would be if they were otherwise teh best team in the sport.

 

The 2014 Baseball Postseason is Typical

As examples, last year's World Series teams the Kansas City Royals played only 15 games in 30 days, and the San Francisco Giants played only 17 games in 30 days.  The 12 to 15 days off in the non-baseball fantasy world of the MLB postseason, means that teams can turn to three pitchers and give all of them plenty of rest.  But it isn't the way baseball really works.

At one point, the Royals had 5 consecutive days off, and the Giants had 4.  This never happens in the regular season.  Even the All-Star break is only three days.  Very rarely is there anything beyond a one-day break, and even that happens only a couple of times a month. 

What this means is that neither team used the team that got them to the playoffs.  (The NFL, NBA and NHL teams ALL used the very same teams that got them to the playoffs.) 

Baseball teams use a three-man pitching rotation in the playoffs.  Sometimes, they essentially opt for two pitchers only—conceding the likelihood that some of their games are going to be lost—when their third-, or rarely fourth-best pitcher has to face one of their opponents' two-man or three-man rotation members. 

Imagine an NFL team using only one running back and three wide receivers, instead of rotating through their roster in the course of a playoff game—or using only 4 defensive backs and 4 linebackers, instead of rotating 8 or 9 DBs and 6 or 7 linebackers?  In hockey, would a team use only two or three of their forward lines?  Would an NBA team use only the starting five?  They would never make the post season if they tried to present that product to their fans during the regular season.

Those are the equivalents of what Major League Baseball sets up every fall.  No other sport drags its playoffs out in such a way as to completely change the playing field—completely change the dynamics of its game.

Why Does Baseball Do This?

MLB does this because the TV networks want to drag out the games so that they can try to have one game each day  This requires an unnecessary staggering of games, and creates the phenomenon of 15 off-days in a month.

What about travel days?

What about them?  Baseball has travel days constantly.  A team may play in Chicago one day and in Miami the next, or in New York one day and Phoenix the very next day.  Travel days as a routine part of the game are again, a phenomenon of television, and stretching out the playoffs.

In years past, travel days were employed only when necessary. The famous "subway series" games were played on seven consecutive days.  Why?  Because there was no "travel day" required to go from Brooklyn to the Bronx.  Today, they would put in artificial travel days.

Even fairly long train trips didn't necessarily matter.  The 1948 World Series between the Cleveland Indians and the Boston Braves was played in six consecutive days, October 6 & 7 in Boston, October 8, 9 & 10 in Cleveland, and October 11 back in Boston.

This reflects actual baseball, the way the teams play day-in and day-out, and the kind of unique test that baseball presents to its athletes, its managers and management, and to its fans.

In the modern world of charter planes, teams fly from coast to coast to play games on consecutive days.  The artificial "travel day" should be eliminated so that teams can play in the playoffs in the same way that got them there in the first place.


*All these leagues also have pre-seasons and training camps, which add an additional 6-8 weeks to each player's year.


Email us with your feedback, comments, questions and ideas. 

Religious Issues

Religious Issues

  • Religious Issues
    Coming Soon

Copyright New Mexico Political Journal 2015
EMAIL US WITH YOUR FEEDBACK, COMMENTS, QUESTIONS AND IDEAS

.

Loading...