New Mexico Political Journal
mobile icon
New Mexico Political Journal

.

Show Subnavigation
  • Home
  • About NMPJ
    • About
    • Editor
  • Feedback
  • Advertise on NMPJ

FacebookTwitter

If you read New Mexico Political Journal from a Facebook link, and appreciate the coverage of events, please “like” NMPJ on Facebook.

Democrats Run Out of Excuses on Chandler Nomination; Strategic Moves Now Exposed. Are the Architects of the Movida Now Threatening a Democratic Senator with Censure just to Hold his Vote?

03/13/2015

According to media reports, Senators Michael Sanchez and Linda Lopez may have run out of tales, rumors and planted stories—sufficient to hold all 25 Democrats' votes on the Matt Chandler nomination for UNM regent. 

Sanchez and Lopez have used a two-pronged strategy to derail Chandler:  1) Have Senator Daniel Ivey-Soto raise fake "questions" in the Senate Rules Committee about the political committee for which Chandler served as treasurer; and 2) Use "reporters" to publish fake stories about that same committee.

But within only a few minutes, the Ivey-Soto charges were shown to be false:  The committee in question followed campaign finance laws to the letter.  And, as shown in stories farther below, the "news reports" have come apart at the seams.

 

MEMOS AND COMMUNICATION NOW SURFACING FROM DEMOCRATIC PARTY OPERATIVES

Sanchez and Lopez had already been stung by Attorney General Hector Balderas and former Democratic Party Chairman Brian Colón.  Both endorsed the Chandler nomination.

Their letters angered an already agitated Sanchez (who reportedly had a few choice words) and embarrassed both Lopez and Ivey-Soto.

The Balderas and Colón endorsements, combined with the exposure of the false stories that Sanchez and Ivey-Soto had planted (see below), have left the Democratic leader in an odd position. 

All he has left is this memo of exhortation to action from a Democratic Party insider: 

"Republican Matt Chandler is a longtime member of Governor Martinez's political machine.  He served as treasurer of the PAC that scorched Democrats and helped bring the Republicans control of the House in last year's election."

The problem is that everyone in the state already knows that governors appoint their supporters to key positions, not their opponents. This is not news.

 

BUT ARE SENATORS JUST PARTY MEMBERS?  OR ARE THEY SENATORS?  TO WHOM DO THEY ANSWER?

Will the fact that Chandler is a Republican who has worked to elect Republicans be enough for Sanchez to bully his caucus into defeating Chandler?

As we have seen with several votes, certain Democratic senators seem to be completely bully proof, but that number may be only two or three. 

Others have streaks of independence and will stand up to pressure from time to time, but that group is fairly fluid.

 

NOW COMES THE TRUMP CARD OF THE YEAR: 

CENSURE?

Last night we got messages from senators, representatives, lobbyists, government employees and contractors that an extreme pressure move is afoot: 

Senator Michael Sanchez is going to move to censure a certain senator.

One insider wrote:

"Michael has been holding it over [the senator's] head to keep him in line. Since he's voted the party line, Democrats are considering slapping him on the wrist."

 

BUT IS SANCHEZ PLAYING WITH FIRE ON THIS ENTIRE MOVIDA?  WILL DOUBLING DOWN ON ONE SENATOR BE ENOUGH TO SCARE EVERYONE INTO LINE?  OR WILL IT BACKFIRE?

Speculation now is that Sanchez wants to haul out this action at a moment when he can demonstrate his power to harm any senator who steps out of line.  We shall see.  Here's the situation, as one Democratic insider wrote:

"The Balderas and Colón endorsements have put Michael in a box, and that makes everybody in jeopardy of looking like tools, something problematic to the Democratic base. 

It's hard to sell the mistreatment of a regent nominee based on nothing more than the fact he's a Republican and active in politics. 

Hell, every single Democratic (the writer probably meant "Richardson") nominee for regent has been a Democrat who was active in politics. 

How in the hell do we sell this as something different?  Michael is playing with fire."

Most New Mexicans would agree, overwhelmingly.  There are a number of highly sought-after appointments among the 2,000 or so a governor can make.  Among them are the 52 university regents in the state.

The Game & Fish Commission is popular.  So is the State Department of Transportation Board (formerly the Highway Commission).  

It comes as no news that some of the most sought-after appointments are going to be filled by people who are active in politics.  Governors of all 50 states, Democrat and Republican alike make similar appointments. 

Presidents of both parties do the same. (The difference being that Chandler is qualified, unlike some political ambassadors who can't find their new country on the map.)

To mix metaphors on purpose, the Senate will be plowing new ground if they choose this path, and worse, they will have no basis for doing it.


Santa Fe New Mexican Shamed into Killing the

fake Milan Simonich tale about Matt Chandler. 

Now What?

Famed Santa Fe New Mexican "reporter" Milan Simonich suddently dropped one of his bogus tales about Matt Chandler Thursday afternoon.  In a 4:34 PM post, Simonich filed this story:

"Senate sends governor’s regent pick back to Committee"

This indicates Simonich is still working with some Senate Democrats, but what is notable in this afternoon's article is that Simonich dropped all Milan's Logo?references to his own fake story about Chandler's political committee having "lied" about former State Representative Liz Thomson.

Earlier in the day, NMPJ had easily disproved Simonich's whopper by simply posting Thomson's vote on the issue in question.  That, by the way, is something any real reporter could have done in a few minutes, let alone the six months the New Mexican has had the story.  (See Milan's logo at right.)

We also disproved the fake story pushed by Democrats that Independent Expenditure Committees cannot contribute to other committees.  Another whopper—suggested by Senator Daniel Ivey-Soto—and used by at least some of his colleagues as an excuse to oppose Chandler.

 

Democrats are now down to one, tiny complaint about Chandler. One. Let's Look at It.

In a 492-word story this afternoon, the New Mexican article boiled down its only remaining grudge against former District Attorney Matt Chandler:  The committee for which he was the treasurer produced a mailer against State Representative Stephanie Garcia Richard that contained an error.

Okay, even though no "treasurer" in the entire history of political campaigns has ever prepared a mailer, TV spot or radio ad, for the sake of argument let's go ahead and assume Chandler is totally responsible for the mail piece in question.  Let's examine it.

The mailer said that "Stephanie Garcia Richard voted for the "expungement bill." She had not. She had only "supported" the bill. A researcher had apparently forgotten his or her documentation. 

The mistake was saying she "Voted For" the bill, instead of "supported." Garcia Richard had documented her support for expungement in response to this question in an Albuquerque Journal questionnaire:

12. Would you support or oppose a law providing that court and police records for people arrested but not convicted of a crime could be removed from public view? (This would not include crimes against children, sex offenses and drunken driving).

Garcia Richard's answer?

"I would support such a law, based on the right that an individual is innocent until proven guilty."

So, that's it.  The remaining "rationale" against Matt Chandler's being a regent at the University of New Mexico is that some political consultant or printer used the words "Voted For" on a mail piece, instead of "Supported."

 

Chandler Got Involved in Republican Party Politics

The other approach the Democrats may be taking is that Chandler is a Republican, and supports GOP campaigns.  

Whoa!  Stop the presses. "Man Bites Dog."

So a nominee for a regent position has been involved in party politics.  If the Democrats go down this trail—which is the only remaining path—they will be making one of the most phony and insincere points in the history of the legislature.  And the competition for that is pretty doggone stiff.

Moderate and centrist, independent-minded Democrats have been sold a bill of goods on this, and are being pressured to do what the boss man says. But their constituents deserve courage, not capitulation or cowering before a party boss.

back to list
National Issues

National Issues

Democrats

2016 Presidential Campaign - Democrats

Republicans

2016 Presidential Campaign - Republicans

Jeb Bush gets religion.

"They said he got religion at the end, and I'm glad that he did."  — Tom T. Hall. The Year Clayton Delaney died.

Well, it's official.  Jeb Bush has changed quite of few of his positions on illegal immigration.  The single most significant is that he no longer endorses the "path to citizenship" for those who came here illegally. 

This is, after all, the key portion of any proposal aimed at "reforming" our existing illegal immigration situation.

No sensible citizen can see any point in trying to deport between 12 and 16 million people currently living in America illegally.  And no candidate for any office that we know of supports that.  What the average American wants is for the country to "get a handle on it."  They want it stopped, our borders secured and future illegal immigration prevented.  It is a national security issue.

The Path to Legal Status

The only way to accomplish the above goals, is to identify current illegal immigrants, get them accounted for, have them documented, and placed on a path to legal status.  Neither they nor their children or spouses should live in a state of fear or anxiety.

But a path to "citizenship" is not the right course.  It is not morally or legally correct.  A merciful and compassionate nation can provide the safeguards of legal status without sending the message to the rest of the world that all you have to do is cross our border and you will eventually get to become a citizen, thus circumventing the legal framework scores of millions of Americans have followed, honored and respected.

If someone who is granted legal status eventually wants to become a citizen, that person should have to return to his or her country of origin and wait in line like 20 million people around the world are doing at any given time.  Failing that, America will forever send the signal that anyone in the world can "jump the line," and that there is no reason at all to obey our immigration and naturalization laws.

We Like Jeb Bush

We are glad Jeb Bush has learned this lesson.  He is a fine speaker, and can eloquently explain his positions on complex issue.  If he were not named "Bush" he would be an actual top tier candidate—in all that that title would entail, including likelihood of acceptance and support of and from the American people in the primaries, and in any theoretical general election.  

We also recognize that he already is a de facto top-tier candidate because of his fame and his fundraising.

If he were to be the nominee of the Republican Party we would heartily support him and endorse him.  We hope, however, that he is not, as he does not give the center-right coalition the best chance of winning.

Media Watch

Media Watch

County Government News

County Government News

Cities, Towns and Villages

Cities, Towns and Villages

Judicial Watch

Judicial Watch

Movies, Television, Pop Culture

Movies, Television, Pop Culture

  • Movies, Television, Pop Culture
    Selma   ????? We have now seen the Oscar-nominated movie Selma.   Our earlier allusion to criticism that sounded as though it was in an Oliver Stone category for historical fabrication is some...

Sports

Sports

The Major League Baseball Playoffs are not realistic, and destroy the actual meaning of the sport. 

Major League Baseball is unique in this respect—its postseason is markedly different from the way the game is played normally.  No other major league sport suffers from this flaw.

Not that much is wrong with baseball. In some respects it's the most well thought-out sport there is.  The "perfect game" many aficionados say.

But the Major League Baseball postseason experience is unique in the world of professional sports, and not in a good way. 

In fact the playoffs are flawed in such a way as to detract from the sport itself and diminish the game and what it means to be the world champion of the sport. 

Among the Big Four team sports of North America: football, hockey, basketball and baseball—and all the 122 professional major league teams competing in the NFL, NHL, NBA and MLB respectively—it is in baseball alone that the postseason turns the sport itself on its head and makes it reflect something that it is not.  This article will explain why that happens and why it is wrong-headed.

 

Background on the The Frequency of Play

The 30 teams in both the National Hockey League and the National Basketball Association teams play a very similar schedule.  On average, each team has a day off between games, sometimes two days off.  Though there are back-to-back games, they are relatively infrequent.  NBA teams play between 14 and 22 back-to-back games a season, and for the NHL it usually ranges between 9 and 19. The NFL has a full week between games, the exception being the new Thursday games that each team plays once, leaving them only four days' rest once a year.

But baseball players play every single day.  Ten days straight, then a day off, then seven more games, then a day off, then ten more games.  Typically a baseball team plays 27 games every 30 days.  For the NHL and NBA it would be 14 per month, and for the NFL the number would be 4.

 

Getting to the Playoffs:  It's a grind

In all four sports, getting to the postseason requires a total team effort—in fact an all-out total organizational effort.  Teams must be deep, have bench strength and the capability of moving players in and out of the lineup, and on and off the roster, who can take the place of key players who go down for an injury, or who have to miss games for whatever reason.  While this is true of the other three major sports as well, it is most certainly even more of a concern for baseball teams because of the sheer volume of games in which a team must field a competitive lineup.

Each league's regular season* is a marathon, not a sprint.  NFL teams play for 17 weeks, 16 games.  The NHL has an 82-game season over six months, paralleled by an NBA season of 84 games over the same timeframe. Baseball is the biggest marathon of all—a true test of resilience and endurance—162 games usually starting around the beginning of April and finishing about the end of September.

NHL teams carry 23-man rosters, of which 20 can be active for any particular game.  The NBA is similar, with 15-man rosters of which 13 can be on the bench for a given game. In the NFL, the teams have 53 players on a roster, but only 46 can suit up on game day.  In Major League Baseball, teams have a 25-man active roster, and all 25 are at the park every day.

 

The Postseason Playoffs:  Sport by Sport

The National Football League:

Of the 32 teams, 12 qualify for the playoffs.  The playoffs are conducted in the exact same manner as the regular season.  Each team plays once a week, the exception being that the four top teams get the first week off.  For a typical qualifier to reach the Super Bowl, the team must play three consecutive weeks.  At that point both remaining teams have two weeks off before the Super Bowl.

In short, the playoffs, with a game each week, reflects the same means of advancement as is present in regular season grind.

The National Hockey League: 

16 of the 30 teams qualify for the postseason.  The playoffs are conducted in the exact same manner as the regular season: a game, a day off, a game, a day off, a game, a day off, and so on.  Just as in the regular season, there are occasionally two days off.  But the playoffs require the same stamina, the same approach as that required to make the playoffs.

 

The National Basketball Association

16 of the 30 teams qualify for the postseason.  The playoffs are conducted in the exact same manner as the regular season: a game, a day off, a game, a day off, a game, a day off, and so on.  Just as in the regular season, there are occasionally two days off.  But the playoffs require the same stamina, the same approach as that required to make the playoffs.

Major League Baseball

10 of the 30 teams qualify for the postseason.  (Although four of those teams qualify only for a one-game do-or-die play-in game.)

Here is where all similarity to baseball ends. 

Unlike the other three sports whose playoffs mirror the test of the regular season, and whose conditions are the same as the regular season, Major League Baseball playoffs in no way resemble the sport itself.  In hockey, basketball and football, the teams win playoff games and reach the pinacle of the sport in exactly the same way that they qualify to try to do so. 

Not so in baseball.  They are two entirely different concepts.  Teams make the playoffs only because they have depth, five-man pitching rotations and can play day-in and day-out at a high level.  But the baseball playoffs suddenly become a kind of "all-star" game within each team's roster.  MLB playoffs are conducted in a way that more closely follows the NBA and the NHL.  Teams have enormous numbers of days off. 

Here's the key point:  No Major League Baseball team could even qualify for the postseason if they played the same way during the regular season that they do in the playoffs.  None.

In the regular season Major League Baseball teams have to use a 5-man starting rotation, with pitchers pitching every 5th day.  There are not enough days off to have even a four-man rotation, let alone a team with three pitchers.  Even the best team in baseball using only a 4-man rotation, would wear them out, and most likely end up with a record of something like 66-96, or 70-92—and that would be if they were otherwise teh best team in the sport.

 

The 2014 Baseball Postseason is Typical

As examples, last year's World Series teams the Kansas City Royals played only 15 games in 30 days, and the San Francisco Giants played only 17 games in 30 days.  The 12 to 15 days off in the non-baseball fantasy world of the MLB postseason, means that teams can turn to three pitchers and give all of them plenty of rest.  But it isn't the way baseball really works.

At one point, the Royals had 5 consecutive days off, and the Giants had 4.  This never happens in the regular season.  Even the All-Star break is only three days.  Very rarely is there anything beyond a one-day break, and even that happens only a couple of times a month. 

What this means is that neither team used the team that got them to the playoffs.  (The NFL, NBA and NHL teams ALL used the very same teams that got them to the playoffs.) 

Baseball teams use a three-man pitching rotation in the playoffs.  Sometimes, they essentially opt for two pitchers only—conceding the likelihood that some of their games are going to be lost—when their third-, or rarely fourth-best pitcher has to face one of their opponents' two-man or three-man rotation members. 

Imagine an NFL team using only one running back and three wide receivers, instead of rotating through their roster in the course of a playoff game—or using only 4 defensive backs and 4 linebackers, instead of rotating 8 or 9 DBs and 6 or 7 linebackers?  In hockey, would a team use only two or three of their forward lines?  Would an NBA team use only the starting five?  They would never make the post season if they tried to present that product to their fans during the regular season.

Those are the equivalents of what Major League Baseball sets up every fall.  No other sport drags its playoffs out in such a way as to completely change the playing field—completely change the dynamics of its game.

Why Does Baseball Do This?

MLB does this because the TV networks want to drag out the games so that they can try to have one game each day  This requires an unnecessary staggering of games, and creates the phenomenon of 15 off-days in a month.

What about travel days?

What about them?  Baseball has travel days constantly.  A team may play in Chicago one day and in Miami the next, or in New York one day and Phoenix the very next day.  Travel days as a routine part of the game are again, a phenomenon of television, and stretching out the playoffs.

In years past, travel days were employed only when necessary. The famous "subway series" games were played on seven consecutive days.  Why?  Because there was no "travel day" required to go from Brooklyn to the Bronx.  Today, they would put in artificial travel days.

Even fairly long train trips didn't necessarily matter.  The 1948 World Series between the Cleveland Indians and the Boston Braves was played in six consecutive days, October 6 & 7 in Boston, October 8, 9 & 10 in Cleveland, and October 11 back in Boston.

This reflects actual baseball, the way the teams play day-in and day-out, and the kind of unique test that baseball presents to its athletes, its managers and management, and to its fans.

In the modern world of charter planes, teams fly from coast to coast to play games on consecutive days.  The artificial "travel day" should be eliminated so that teams can play in the playoffs in the same way that got them there in the first place.


*All these leagues also have pre-seasons and training camps, which add an additional 6-8 weeks to each player's year.


Email us with your feedback, comments, questions and ideas. 

Religious Issues

Religious Issues

  • Religious Issues
    Coming Soon

Copyright New Mexico Political Journal 2015
EMAIL US WITH YOUR FEEDBACK, COMMENTS, QUESTIONS AND IDEAS

.

Loading...